1088
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You think that's bad? Heh Libertarianism is a leftist ideology. Not at all liberal. They HATE us.

Heh and all the down votes without rebuttal prove it. They know better. They still hate to admit it. But they know better.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Libertarianism (traditionally) is on the bottom of the vertical (authority) axis on a traditional political compass, if you want to use that. It is neither left nor right. It can be either. The people who have taken the name are on the right. They're anarchy-capitalists who don't want to be ruled by government but want to be ruled by capitalists. Anarchists, for example, are libertarian leftists, using the terms properly.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

The political Compass is a joke. It's more accurate than just left or right. But libertarian isn't a state that spans from left to right at the bottom. Libertarianism as it was designed is strictly a left ideology. Oriented about social Freedom Above All Else. Economic liberalism. Is an ideology predicated on complete economic freedom. Economic Liberals are not libertarians. Never have been. Never will be. They have diametrically opposed ideologies.

The problem with economic liberalism is that it puts the cart before the horse. You cannot have a free economy without a free society. Economic liberalism doesn't care about Society in general. Just the free market. And they figure that magically a free Society will somehow follow. It never has but that's the magical thinking involved.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

A libertarian is a Republican trying to sleep with a Democrat. All the bloody graphs in the word won't change what people are.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 30 points 1 year ago

Those downvotes are people's way of telling you that your comment is so comically wrong it's not even worth a rebuttal. I agree with them.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Please explain. None of you can explain how that is. You just pretend it is. You just redefined things to mean whatever you want ignoring their original meaning. I can point to actual facts and evidence. I can point to history. All you can do is claim something and not back it up. Do you honestly think Joseph Dejacque would be accepting or abide a group of delusioned liberal nuggets? Do you even know who he is?

For those actually curious. Joseph Dejacque is the man that coined the term Libertarianism and defined it. He fought against imperialists, mercantilist, and capitalist. He was literally active in the French Revolution in france. In the early 1800s. Fervently pro labor etc. For 100 years there were no "right wing" libertarians. But post red scare and the 1950s. A bunch of privileged economic liberals decided to redefine the ideology and it's meaning from the ground up. To be the opposite of what it's creator intended. And the easiest way to prove this is to ask a right-wing liberal about Adam Smith and the Invisible Hand of the market. They literally fetishize him. The man and his ideology. Economic liberalism

[-] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

“Libertarian” doesn’t mean the same thing today that it meant in 2001; it’s a far departure from what it meant in the 1800’s.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

Who cares what right wing "libertarians" think words mean? You can't steal and shit all over the meaning of a word from the group that made it.

[-] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Who cares what right wing “libertarians” think

Those of us that use the English language on a daily basis.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Your name is now Dipshit MCGee. You will be referred to as such by everyone at all times, or I'll shit and piss myself while whining about linguistic positions I don't actually understand.

We've all agreed, the ignorant dumbasses of the world, and if you don't you don't understand language.

Your name has been given to the guy you hate most in the world. He's decided to spell it differently. Incorrectly. And, this is important:

He's doing it just to piss you off, because he is literally just a spiteful, self centered moron.

[-] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

And your name is now Cockface McTrumper. I hope you shit and piss yourself as much as you’ve promised; otherwise you’ll get demoted to Lying McFuckface.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nah, I don't have to play along.

I don't believe that's how this works.

That's your position, as you will recall, not believing in objectivity and precision of language, and that the enemies of an ideology get to decide what their own name means.

Dipshit.

Who tacitly accepted my change of their name, btw.

[-] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You probably don’t believe in reality or data either, but that’s never stopped you from being an embarrassment to your family for all these years; why stop now?

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

Projection? I'd say you're better than this, MCGee, but we know you're not.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

You do know definitions and usage change over time, right? That’s like comparing an Eisenhower Republican to trump. There may be a few similarities, but overall they’re wildly different.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yes we are well aware. Up Is Down black is white love is hate war is peace freedom is slavery.

No, definitions don't generally change. Especially not to mean the opposite of how they we're initially defined.

You're confusing a party for an ideology. There is no "Republican" ideology. Especially since Trump took over. Ideologically, since at least the 1930s Republicans were pretty solidly fascist. At least in private. They're just more open about it today.

But hey, we can still compare our non aggression principles. This is mine.

1000001797

It's a French classic!

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Golly! Look at that. The Liberals were so confident that they were right. I mean if I'm so ridiculously wrong shouldn't it be easy to prove me wrong? Kind of by definition even? Makes you wonder why they aren't trying. I'm sure they will continue to pyrrhicly down vote regardless.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 9 points 1 year ago
[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That's a sad response. But I know it's the best you had liberal.😄

[-] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago
[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

If liberals knew what words meant or weren't innately self-centered, they'd be social democrats at worst.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

True. I still hold out hope for them. I know it's possible for people to overcome. Even if it is hard.

this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
1088 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

9097 readers
2536 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS