1396
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] venoft@lemmy.world 85 points 1 year ago

She's wrong though, everything following the scientific method is science. The fact that you didn't pay out of your ass to publicize your research doesn't matter. Of course it reaches less people, but that's a separate issue.

[-] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 8 points 1 year ago

With all these "she" talk in this comment section, I was like when did LeCun change gender?

I don't even do anything remotely related to AI, but I know LeCun is a dude.

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 year ago

The scientific method includes peer reviewing.

You don't have to post it on a commercial database, only free one will do. But it needs to be accessible by the world.

[-] oce@jlai.lu 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Does it require independent peer review though? How do you achieve that ~~with~~ without publication? The predatory publication system is a different point.

Edit: fix without

There's no such thing as a scientific method

[-] oce@jlai.lu 9 points 1 year ago

He probably means the idealized scientific method you learn at school is not what really happens in reality, in particular "soft" science fields may not be able to follow it strictly and still do good science.

[-] humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Doesn't this difference make the scientific method not real?

Edit: I don't talk about bad science.

[-] Johanno@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

The scientific method varies from field to field. In medicine you usually need to proof it by taking a significant amount people. Then create a control group and a testing group. Then test your medicine on the group and give the other placebos.

When you can measure health improvement for one group over the other there is a reasonable amount of proof that the medicine works.

The scientific method has one major goal. Reduce human made errors in science. Humans do not work objectively. Humans always have an bias. Things like reproduceable tests and peer review try to reduce the bias.

Take 10 labs and you'll get 10 definitions of the scientific method. It's just a tradition that yields some results.

peer review try to reduce the bias.

Sounds like you haven't been peer reviewed enough

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

everything following the scientific method is science

I'm fairly certain "report conclusions" is a pretty big deal in the scientific method. Principle of verifiability and all that.

[-] CptOblivius@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

True a lot of science is done in industry and the corporate world and not published to keep it a trade secret. It is still science but not shared.

this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
1396 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

16103 readers
2747 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS