1325
The Internet Archive is under a DDoS attack
(bsky.app)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
1325 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
60113 readers
1699 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I sometimes wonder what needs to happen to people in order for them to confidently write nonsense like this.
Blindly dismissing it is pretty naive ;)
Have you ever heard the phrase, "that which is asserted without evidence maybe dismissed without evidence"?
yeah but we also live in the age where difference between a conspiracy theory and an outright conspiracy can sometimes be as short as 6 months lol
Sounds like it doesn’t take long to wait for evidence then hu?
about the same time when they start busting corpo leakers
Ok. In the meantime, I don't have to believe anything that's untrue.
Did somebody tell you what to believe in this comment section?
No. Review the thread.
This started with you being 100% sure of something you seem to have zero evidence for.
I didn't make that statement.
Ah, you're right. I made a mistake there.
It began with a person being 100% sure of something they had zero evidence for.
Yep. Tbh I ain't buying it either but still down shoot the shit, hear some good tinfoil. But he ain't even trying :/
Burden of proof baby... U accuse someone of something, it's ur job to prove it (or at least come up with a hypothesis). Just commenting ur conclusion n running away giggling is not the nicest thing to do.
The irony of claiming burden of proof on a post about proof being suppressed.
My hunch is the billions of dollars we have recently siphoned into a cyber warfare branch of the military, Project 2025, which is advancing almost identically to how The Plan for the New American Century progressed 20 years ago, and a President who is in bed with a war criminal fugitive. Oh, and they also recently started one of the largest censorship campaigns in decades Ala "STOP FREELY SHARING INFORMATION ON TIK TOK! WE ARE SUPPOSED TO FILTER RAW INFORMATION OUT AND PROPAGANDA IN VIA MAJOR NEWS NETWORKS AND ISP THROTTLES THAT WE CONTROL!!@!@"
The 100% part was hyperbole, but America is the one doing everything in it's power to spark WWIII, and the one that benefits most from scrubbing recent history.
Ok, we at least have a hypothesis now. So u'r saying, the US military is secretly executing a Republican plan when a Democrat is in office, when there was a Republican President in office just 3 years ago who tried to coup the government? Don't u think the military would've pulled shit waaaay more noticeable than DDOSing a goddamn archive for five minutes?
Also, why would America want to spark WW3? Businesses function best during peacetime. WW3 would definitely mean usage of nuclear weapons. By your logic, we should've already had a nuclear war back when the Soviet Union existed.
This is just like the anti vax conspiracies- the US military is putting chips through vaccinations to control u.
I’m sure there’s proof just laying around, what is the article about ? Oh nevermind if someone didn’t write about it online it’s not true. The US has no history of this type of nonsense.
Again, burden of proof. Ur comment is similar to anti vaxxers saying- "Bill Gates is putting microchips through vaccinations to control society. What, why're you asking me for proof? Look it up! It's right there on the internet! Plus billionaires are known to pull shit like this."
Maybe he works for them, can’t elaborate because NDA, who knows. What’s the article about again.
Yeah, no. This comment alone would go against any government NDA - and this user is just some random person who, going by their comment history, most certainly has no inside knowledge of anything.
As far as you know
Stupidity mostly.