218
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Discourse on Lemmy is so stupid. It's so stupid. Like Facebook boomer stupid.

Is the IDF counter-attack proportional or is it excessive compared to what Hamas is doing? I would say it's absolutely excessive. How is that excess justified? I would urge you guys to put more thought into any of this discourse beyond "genocide; colonialism; apartheid; imperialism". Please, for the love of god. Try. When you use cheap logic, all you do is give more fodder to IDF --and I'm not a fan of IDF.

If I take your claim and analyze it logically it's not sound at all. The typical numbers game to counter whether the occupation is justified: More civilians dead = IDF bad. Pause. Think about this statement for a second. Do we measure justification for war based on the number of casualties incurred? When the allies bombed Dresden, did we find reason to defeat the Nazis even though many civilian casualties occurred? Yes, a calculated risk was made.

The question is: What ought the IDF do in this scenario with Hamas perpetually shelling them with rockets by planting themselves in civilian areas?

[-] livus@kbin.social 15 points 5 months ago

Dresden was a horrendous war crime too.

I can see how it's harder for you to argue against war crimes from other nations if you're an apologist for war crimes committed by your own ancestors.

But many of us don't need to jump through those particular rhetorical hoops. The barrage of war crimes in WW2 was part of the impetus for strengthening international law against that shit.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Agreed. Kurt Vonnegut wrote all about what he witnessed firsthand at Dresden. It was a war crime. "The good guys" can commit war crimes.

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

I never said it wasn't horrendous. Clearly the rules of engagement back then were different. That's not what is being discussed though is it? What do you think I'm saying? Can you TRY to steel man my position or do you only like to hear yourself?

[-] livus@kbin.social 3 points 5 months ago

@TheFonz I'm sorry but you haven't expressed your position clearly enough for me to summarize and I'm not interested in trying to forensically reconstruct it from your comments as it's too ameliorised.

Like I said above, this conversation isn't some kind of game for points. It's just us talking about our views.

or do you only like to hear yourself

False dichotomy, and a bit of a swing and a miss.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 months ago

... with Hamas perpetually shelling them

Yeah, you're wrong.

Hamas launched a barrage of rockets at central Israel on Sunday afternoon, setting off air-raid sirens in the Tel Aviv area for the first time since at least late January Source

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

"central israel". Key word. Also, not connected to what we're discussing. But thanks for sharing, I guess?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Sorry... you're comparing what Israel is doing right now to what allies did to a city in the country that was itself perpetrating the genocide? A country that was also itself invading Allied nations?

Is this opposite day or something?

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Nop. I'm contesting your logic. Not comparing the countries. We are examining whether your logic holds up to scrutiny.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

I don't even know what you think my logic is beyond "the more innocent people you kill, the less morally justified your position becomes."

Can you give an example of when that is not the case? Because I don't know too many people who think that the bombing of Dresden was morally justified.

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Ok, so if Hamas kills more people that automatically makes Israel's actions justified?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

If it was proportional? If it didn't involve innocents? Yes.

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Is there any war-ever in history- that didn't involve civilian casualties? Any?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Is there any war ever in history that all actions on either are morally justified?

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

In war, you are allowed to kill innocents if necessary to achieve a valid military objective.

In this war, the IDF's objective is to destroy Hamas.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

"Allowed" by whom? "Necessary" by whose metric?

If their objective is to destroy Hamas and they determine that the only way to do that is wipe out the Palestinian people from the face of the Earth, you're saying that's justified because it's their necessary military objective?

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Allowed by international law.

Necessary according to their military capabilities, which can be judged by observers.

Most observers don't think destroying Hamas requires wiping out all Palestinians, but at the same time it's impossible to destroy Hamas without civilian casualties.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Okay, well observers are saying Israel is committing genocide, so I'm not sure what your issue is.

Also, I'm not sure why you think what is legal is the same as what is moral.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Legal isn't the same as moral, but there is no consensus on the morality of war. Some people are pacifists and believe all war is immoral. Most people believe war is justified if it has a legitimate casus belli.

Whether or not Israel is committing genocide is a separate question from whether a military action is morally permissible, because genocide involves actions with no military purpose. In other words it's possible that strikes like these are morally permissible even if a government is also doing things that are illegal, like blocking aid delivery.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Once again- if Israel determines that wiping out every last Palestinian has a military purpose, that, according to you, is not genocide and is also justified.

You have a very strange idea about what is or is not justified in this world. You seem to think Dresden was justified and that killing thousands of children in Gaza is justified because things happen in war.

Please do contact the parents of dead Gazan children and let them know those deaths were justified. Let me know how it goes.

load more comments (92 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago

Yeah Germany also claimed it was attacked by Poland in 1939. Guess everything after was justified then... The US claimed to have been attacked by North Vietnam. Guess Vietnam was aokay then. Putin claimed to have been attacked by Ukraine before invading. Guess we should consider everything since then as self defense...

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

You're saying because some countries lied about needing defense no country should be allowed to defend themselves? What exactly is your point here? Is it possible some countries actually need to defend themselves?

[-] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago

Proportionality is simply not dependent on the question of who "started first" and you will always find something that is credibly or uncredibly put forth as "the beginning". This is why Israel tries to claim it all started on Oct. 7. This is why Germany argued Poland started arming and preparing for war first. This one is even technically true, but ignores the context of Germany already announcing its Lebensraum ideology back then.

That is the problem. There is a both a larger context and a direct context to the question of proportionality, where there is no plus points for being "just retaliating". Retaliation can be a legitimate goal, but only in the context of deterring from further attacks, like Iran did after the embassy attack.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
218 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38944 readers
1421 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS