245
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 51 points 6 months ago

Isn't Biden already holding back arms shipments?

Isn't that why the Republicans are freaking out right now because he isn't a friend to Israel?

Can you explain because I'm confused.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 61 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I think he's walking a line. On the one side are people who want the US to stop all support until Israel stops, want the US to stop threatening the international courts seeking to hold Israel officials accountable for war crimes - essentially, want the US to treat Israel like we are treating Russia. On the other side is a powerful, well-funded pro-Israel lobby (which the Palestinians don't have) and a traditionally fairly cohesive and influential pro-Israel voting block. Plus, Israel is our Ally, like officially; Palesteine is not.

He's slowly, slightly shifting from full-throated support of Israel, but so far all he's doing is withhold some ordinance. It feels as of all he's doing is pissing off both sides, rather than shifting some support.

Honestly, I think he's in a no-win situation. It's critical for the USA that he win this next election - Trump is an existential threat to Democracy in the US. There's a lot of money and influence he loses by not getting the pro-Israel lobby on his side, and who does he lose by continuing support? Are the disenfranchised youth going to vote for him if he pivots on Israel? All the folks who've been complaining (rightly) about the cost of living, housing prices, healthcare costs, loss of rights over their own bodies - all these folks who protest-voted in the primaries and are threatening to protest-vote in the general election... they're all suddenly going to jump on Team Biden if he cuts off Israel? In enough numbers to counter what he loses from the pro-Israel lobby?

So I think the irony is that if standing with Israel means he can win the election, it's still a better outcome for Palestine than if he loses. If he loses the election, Trump will tell Israel to just go ahead and glass the area.

Edit: Came across this article here today, which I think has basically the same view.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago

Thank you, thank you, thank you. It feels better knowing that at least one other person around here gets it. I've been trying to explain this to people since the start of this whole thing and all I get is downvoted into oblivion for it.

On the other side is a bigger powerful, well-funded pro-Israel lobby (which the Palestinians don’t have) and a traditionally fairly cohesive and influential pro-Israel voting block.

The bolding is my own addition. I think this is the part people seem to refuse to understand. The pro-Israel side is many times larger than the pro-Palestine side. Even if he were to change positions the day that Israel bombed the first hospital, all that would mean is that we'd be seeing even larger pro-Israel protests instead of pro-Palestine ones, and politicians from both parties would be taking Biden to task for essentially abandoning one of our allies.

And I agree with your assessment that at this point, all he's doing is pissing both sides off. But in reality, there was never a situation where he wasn't going to piss off somebody. From the point of view of his attempts to get re-elected, he's probably taking the least shitty option available to him. Whether or not any of us agree on if it's the morally correct choice, I at least can acknowledge and understand that the other options available to him are all significantly worse and would only significantly increase Trump's chances of winning, which is just worse for everybody regardless of which side of the issue you're on.

[-] kaffiene@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's not black and white politically. It's clear as day morally. And he's falling on that score

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago

It's critical for the USA that he win this next election - Trump is an existential threat to Democracy in the US.

It's critical for the world that Trump not win.

Trump is immediately going to stop any support for Ukraine and hand that to Putin on a silver platter, is going to weaken NATO and the UN as much as he possibly can, and is going to flip the US from the virtual 'allies' to 'axis' before the end of his first next four years. Which will go on as long as he is alive, as once he gets power he's not giving it up.

He isn't even playing coy with his praise for megalomaniacal current dictators, especially Putin.

With Trump in charge of the US, you can expect him and Putin together actively working to spread Christian fascism to Europe using subversion and eventually force where needed.

It's not just the US that's on the line in November.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Don’t forget Taiwan. Tech investments aside, Taiwan doesn’t stand a chance against China alone.

[-] dumpsterlid@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

So I think the irony is that if standing with Israel means he can win the election, it’s still a better outcome for Palestine than if he loses. If he loses the election, Trump will tell Israel to just go ahead and glass the area.

The irony is how much you have twisted your political beliefs to find a position you feel ok about this from.

The majority of Americans think what Israel is doing is heinous and want it to stop, the idea that Americans are evenly divided on this is not grounded in reality.

[-] rothaine@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Who said Americans are evenly divided on it?

[-] pete@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago

Kinda I guess, he's said he would hold back one part of a single shipment, but that is the absolute bare minimum

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

So why are the republicans freaking out?

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 6 months ago

When aren't they freaking out?

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

When Israel gets what it wants

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 6 months ago

Ah yes, they definitely weren't freaking out about othet things before Isreal started the invasion

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They weren't freaking out about Israel until Biden held shipments to Israel.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 6 months ago

And my point is they always have something they are freaking out about so why care Republicans are freaking out

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

The point is that if Biden did something to make the GOP freak out, then it wasn't nothin

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

They freaked out about Obama wearing a tan suit. It's not always something.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 6 months ago

And my point is they always have something they are freaking out about so why care Republicans are freaking out

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Because when they freak out about something a Democrat did, it usually means a Democrat did some good.

[-] Djtecha@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

No they're still freaking out.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Well a Democrat did something so they need to bitch about it.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

The bare minimum used to be calling for a ceasefire.

Some people will never be satisfied, so it's pointless to try to satisfy them.

[-] kaffiene@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Unless. Just maybe, Genocide is more important than playing politics

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

To most people, Gaza is not the most important issue in this election. So to them, the "bare minimum" on Gaza might be more than enough.

this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
245 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19080 readers
3145 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS