1363
submitted 1 year ago by UhBell@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago

Yes you don't want to just eat plants, hence you are eating animals for taste pleasure.

Why do you think it's okay to kill someone for pleasure? What's humane about that?

[-] MarioSpeedWagon@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Ploughing fields for plants kills animals too

[-] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah and having an accident with your car may also kill people. Should that count as murder? You know, since apparently intention is irrelevant.

[-] MarioSpeedWagon@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago
[-] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

You don't know what you are talking about.

[-] door_in_the_face@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

You should look up the definition of murder. Murder requires intent, otherwise it's manslaughter.

[-] m532@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago
[-] door_in_the_face@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

Ok sure, but a fair justice system should differentiate between intentionally killing someone and accidentally causing a death, right? Giving the same punishment to someone who kills their spouse because they cheated vs. someone who lost control of their car and crashed into a pedestrian would be extremely weird.

[-] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Vehicular manslaughter under a variety of different names is a crime in many many maaaaannnny countries.

[-] coffeekomrade@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

Man, you are gonna be real mad when you learn how conservation and wildlife management works

[-] osmn@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Animals other than humans aren't people, that's why it's okay. You should be the first law enforcement official that prosecutes predatorial non-human animals

[-] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's shocking to me how many people don't understand that saying "they aren't the same species as us, so because of that we can treat them with impunity" is analogous to saying "they aren't the same skin color as us, so because of that we can treat them with impunity"

[-] osmn@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

See, now you're actually just forcing your worldview on people. They literally are not people, they are not sentient, intelligent, nor do they have language. They are not analagous to people, and you comparing this to racism is a really shitty attempt at ad hominem.

Grow up.

[-] 4ce@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

they are not sentient

Science disagrees with you here. Most of the animals being used for meat are in fact not just sentient, but also conscious:

Convergent evidence indicates that non-human animals have the neuroanatomical, neurochemical, and neurophysiological substrates of conscious states along with the capacity to exhibit intentional behaviors. Consequently, the weight of evidence indicates that humans are not unique in possessing the neurological substrates that generate consciousness. Non-human animals, including all mammals and birds, and many other creatures, including octopuses, also possess these neurological substrates.

-- From the Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness

[-] osmn@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Got me on that point - my primary point is that due to their lesser function, and extremely different species, I find it just fine to consume them given they're raised properly, and aren't constantly in pain. Y'know, not in cages, and not exploiting the definition of "grass fed", or "organic", or whatever Tyson wants to advertise next that makes rich people feel like they're the good guys.

Ultimately, once lab meat can be of the same quality and easily accessible/affordable, then I'd consider switching. No reason not to. Until then, it's the easiest, most accessible, most fulfilling, and healthiest way to get the nutrients we need, and doesn't weigh on my conscience, nor should it.

Fuck Tyson though, those bastards can go to hell.

[-] 4ce@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

lesser function

Putting aside that this might be difficult to quantify, why do you think it matters? There are some groups of humans who exhibit severely diminished mental capacities compared to the average human (e.g. babies, severely mentally handicapped people, people in a coma, etc.). Would it be okay to eat them? Because I'm fairly confident that for whatever measure to compare cognitive functions you could come up with, we would be able to find at least some humans who perform worse on them than the average pig, for example.

different species

Why does this matter? As a hypothetical thought experiment, do you think it would be morally justified for us to eat aliens who are biologically very different from us but of comparative intelligence (or higher)? Or for them to eat us?

it’s the easiest, most accessible, most fulfilling, and healthiest way

Apart from the "fulfilling", which is arguably subjective, I don't think the rest is true. At least I don't see how not eating meat would be difficult or "inaccessible" in a significant way, and considering the last point studies regularly show that vegetarians and vegans are, on average, slightly healthier than other people if anything (which might be in part just correlation, but it does contradict your claim of meat being the "healthiest" way to get nutrients).

Fuck Tyson though, those bastards can go to hell.

On this we can definitely agree.

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
1363 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45633 readers
1506 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS