479

submitted 7 months ago by ToastedPlanet to c/196

211 comments fedilink hide all child comments

There are no ethical choices under first-past-the-post voting. We must instead make a decision that reduces the most harm.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 7 months ago

Got a secret for you: The Democrats would run us over with a tank if it were politically convenient.

And the fascists would do it gleefully, likely finding additional ways to incorporate cruelty and torture. Anti-electoralism is statistically indistinguishable from supporting the fascists or accelerationism. Accelerationism has no hard data showing that it actually works, only that it increases suffering.

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav 5 points 7 months ago

Good thing I'm not suggesting accelerationism then

[-] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago

pLeAsE vOtE fOr 99% FaScIsM tO sAvE uS fRoM 100% fAsCiSm :(

[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 7 months ago

If that 1% means local LGBTQ+ people not being subject to mass murder, why wouldn't you pick 99%, especially if those are the only realistic outcomes?