871
submitted 6 months ago by MilitantVegan@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MilitantVegan@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

There was a time when the "definition" of marriage was a union between only one amab and afab person. Definitions change.

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago

Bro, come on man. I don't give a fuck what you call cheese but likening dairy to sexual preference discrimination is a bit much.

[-] MilitantVegan@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

The lgbtq+ communities and vegans are both seeking justice in their own areas of concern, so it's most definitely not extreme to compare the two.

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

It's extreme. The fact that you can't see that it is undermines your entire argument. You're not doing yourself any favors by saying that vegan cheese is as oppressed as gay people have been. No one's being dragged behind a truck because they presented vegan cheese as a dairy product. No one's shouting slurs at you.

You alienate people who might otherwise have agreed with you.

As an example, look at the other end of the spectrum using exactly the same, ridiculous logic. Selling vegan cheese is legal. Selling people was also once legal.

You really believe in veganism and that's great. I'm happy for you. But punch in your weight class my dude. Some people think vegan blue cheese is better, but it lost a competition for not technically being cheese. Some people think chili has beans, but since 1967 beans have been strictly forbidden from ICS cookoffs but the people's choice competitions strictly require them. There are reasonable parallels to be drawn there.

There is no reasonable parallel between vegan cheese in a cheese cookoff, and actual hatred of LGBTQ+ people

[-] Emma_Gold_Man@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 months ago

You're straw manning their argument. They aren't comparing the oppression of LGBTQIA+ folk to the oppression of cheese. The comparison is to the oppression of animals - who most definitely are being dragged behind the truck.

You can, and probably would, make the argument that animals don't deserve the same level of moral consideration as LGBTQIA+ humans, but the vegan argument is that non-human animals experience pain and suffering and deserve the same right to life and non-exploitation for the same reason that any human (LGBTQIA+ or not) does.

[-] MilitantVegan@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

This, thank you.

[-] Default_Defect@midwest.social 4 points 6 months ago

How incredibly privileged of you.

[-] Beaver@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 months ago

Not its a good comparison.

[-] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

And I suppose it is up to the organizers of a contest over cheese to define the parameters of what constitutes cheese. But milk seems like a reasonable starting point. It is, after all, a dairy product.

[-] MilitantVegan@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Plant-based cheeses are allowed in their competition. They technically got disqualified because one of the ingredients is some type of fat that currently doesn't have GRAS (generally recognized as safe) status. Except they only made it an issue after the plant-based cheese had won.

The whole resistance to reinterpreting culinary language is just nothing but anti-competitiveness.

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That actually strikes me as a extremely reasonable justification for disqualifying it. The fact that they only noticed after it won is also not particularly suspicious.

Edit: how many alt accounts are down voting me for saying that you shouldn't be allowed to enter in a food with potentially unsafe ingredients?

[-] MilitantVegan@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I'll just copy and paste the same thing I replied with, above:

Here are more details (and more context is in the article):

"Someone had tipped off the foundation on something that disqualified Climax, Good Food Foundation Executive Director Sarah Weiner told the Washington Post. The complaint potentially arose from Climax’s use of the ingredient kokum butter, which has not been designated as GRAS (generally regarded as safe) by the Food and Drug Administration. However, Zahn told the Washington Post that the company has replaced the ingredient with cocoa butter, which was the version he said he submitted for the awards (although Weiner contests this).

The Good Food Awards also didn’t require GRAS certification for all ingredients back when contestants submitted their products — rather, the foundation added this to the rules later on. Zahn claims the Good Food Foundation never reached out to Climax to inform the company of the new requirement, although Weiner told the Washington Post it attempted to. SFGATE could not reach the Good Food Foundation for comment in time for publication.

“It would have been very easy for them to reach out to us and tell us about the new requirements,” Zahn told SFGATE. “… The thing that’s upsetting to me is that they were kind of unprofessional by changing the rules a week before the event.”"

https://www.sfgate.com/food/article/berkeley-vegan-cheese-good-food-awards-19431532.php

[-] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Maybe they didn’t make it an issue until after because it was under their radar? Once it became the center of attention they might have thought safety of the winner was important? The vast majority of the comments in this thread don’t even seem to know why it was disqualified.

This whole thread strikes me as odd.

[-] MilitantVegan@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Here are more details (and more context is in the article):

"Someone had tipped off the foundation on something that disqualified Climax, Good Food Foundation Executive Director Sarah Weiner told the Washington Post. The complaint potentially arose from Climax’s use of the ingredient kokum butter, which has not been designated as GRAS (generally regarded as safe) by the Food and Drug Administration. However, Zahn told the Washington Post that the company has replaced the ingredient with cocoa butter, which was the version he said he submitted for the awards (although Weiner contests this).

The Good Food Awards also didn’t require GRAS certification for all ingredients back when contestants submitted their products — rather, the foundation added this to the rules later on. Zahn claims the Good Food Foundation never reached out to Climax to inform the company of the new requirement, although Weiner told the Washington Post it attempted to. SFGATE could not reach the Good Food Foundation for comment in time for publication.

“It would have been very easy for them to reach out to us and tell us about the new requirements,” Zahn told SFGATE. “… The thing that’s upsetting to me is that they were kind of unprofessional by changing the rules a week before the event.”"

https://www.sfgate.com/food/article/berkeley-vegan-cheese-good-food-awards-19431532.php

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

If we can define plant products as milk then we could also define cows as plants. It would make vegan chili contests more interesting.

[-] MilitantVegan@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago
[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Likewise, good luck with vegan "cheese".

[-] MilitantVegan@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Clearly it doesn't need luck - it's already winning awards despite underhanded tricks.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

According to the article, they didn't win.

EDIT:

Actually I guess they did, see below.

[-] MilitantVegan@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

They were slated to win, close enough.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They were selected as finalists, but not every finalist is an award winner.

[-] MilitantVegan@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

No, they had advance warning that they were the winners. That victory was stolen from them based on rules that were added after the fact.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Hmm, OK turns out you're right that they were slated to win.

this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
871 points (100.0% liked)

News

23353 readers
2726 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS