421
submitted 5 months ago by NightOwl@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago

Since it hasn’t been mentioned yet; the real reason TikTok is being banned.

[-] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

Sure. Ignoring that this started in 2020 during Trump's presidency.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Yes. This has been ongoing since TikTok acquired musical.ly. The CFIUS didn’t care as much until it became popular. TikTok has tried to comply, so why isn’t the CFIUS and there considerations being heeded?

[-] anon987@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

You have got to be kidding. Did you really just link the canary? The same canary that got banned from Twitter for making antisemitic remarks.

They also failed dozens of fact checks.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago
[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago
[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I enjoy your YouTube channel. You read Blackshirts and Reds to me.

[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

Nice, thx! I've got 2 more books recorded recently, just gotta do the work of tagging and uploading them (should be ~week or so).

  • Zak Cope - The wealth of (Some) nations.
  • Domenico Losurdo - Nonviolence - A history beyond the myth.
[-] anon987@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

And irrelevant. You are grasping at straws trying to connect all the dots in your conspiracy theories.

[-] Xer0@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago

fact checks

Opinion disregarded.

[-] a_statistician@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago

This move against TikTok predates the Hamas attacks and Israel's military action. It's insane that TikTok's ban is because teens are more likely to be pro-palestine.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

It does. But there are mechanisms within CFIUS that TikTok was working through. Trump and Congress decided to circumvent CFIUS and go after TikTok, which is their right, but why?

So CFIUS would be a good process that would be short of a ban. You know, they could look at the app. They could decide whether or not there are other things that the company could do. But I think Congress has basically gone and kind of short-circuited that process and said, no, we're not going to have the Committee on Foreign Investment look at this. We're not going to have other processes look at it. We're just going to make a decision as the Congress that this app needs to be sold in a short time, or it will be banned.

And so why is it that we'll still be able to access apps like the clothing company Shein in in the U.S. - that's also Chinese owned - Temu, which sells all sorts of stuff - clothing and housing goods? These apps are also Chinese owned and are on a lot of American phones. source

It’s because of TikTok’s popularity and influence.

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This is the same conclusion Second Thought came to a while back in one of his youtube videos. While I don't disagree with the conclusion, I also wouldn't say it's mutually exclusive to reasoning promoted by the mainstream media of "foreign influence. " What's really wild is the idea that the ban is also being pushed by "foreign influence."

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Plausible deniability, 2 birds with 1 stone. There are hundreds of companies with foreign investors and influence. TikTok has tried to work with investigators and even spent $1.5 billion on a server framework for Project Texas. If TikTok was a crappy app and wasn’t the primary source of news for young adults, the government wouldn’t care.

this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
421 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32241 readers
435 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS