46
nuclear take: (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago by DanTDM@lemmy.world to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Serious question: What makes Arch's package manager so "great"? I always just found it confusing to use. The flags don't make any sense to me. It feels like you have to add a varying number of s or y to get it to do what you want. I never found it to be any faster or slower than any of the others (apart from portage of course) out there. And apart from the flags it doesn't seem to give me any more or less trouble than the others.

[-] wfh@lemm.ee 12 points 5 months ago

pacman -Snstall -yefresh -yefresh -unly-upgrades

[-] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

User is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.

[-] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

LOL, me using Debian for the first time.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

sudo is not installed. Check apt search sudo for possible sources.

[-] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

I figured that out after a quick search. Thanks though. I just thought it was kind of funny how I found out Debian doesn't come with sudo.

[-] exu@feditown.com 5 points 5 months ago

As a user it's definitely harder to get into than apt or dnf. However, as a packager, it's very easy to package new applications for pacman. That's also why the AUR offers this many packages often not found in other distros.

[-] Encamped@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

It's fast. That's why it's great. I've considered switching to opensuse a lot, but the speed of pacman compared to how slow zypper is always drags me back to arch

[-] Peasley@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Wow I must be doing something wrong, zypper has always been faster for me than pacman, both on my newer desktop and my older laptop

[-] Encamped@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

I've heard countless times it's one of the slowest package managers and the last time I tried opensuse it confirmed that, though that was a year ago, so I guess improvements have been made

[-] lemmyreader@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

Dunno. Anecdotal, a few years ago pacman appeared to be much faster than apt-get for me. Currently I don't see that very much difference but then again I haven't paid much attention to it.

[-] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

there's nala as an upgrade to apt, but pacman iirc has a few more features still

[-] VeganCheesecake 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I use tumbleweed on my desktop, but run arch on a secondary machine. From experience, pacman is much faster than zypper, even on a slower machine.

this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
46 points (100.0% liked)

linuxmemes

20986 readers
1904 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS