1110
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by tearsintherain@leminal.space to c/technology@lemmy.world

Reddit, AI spam bots explore new ways to show ads in your feed

#For sale: Ads that look like legit Reddit user posts

"We highly recommend only mentioning the brand name of your product since mentioning links in posts makes the post more likely to be reported as spam and hidden. We find that humans don't usually type out full URLs in natural conversation and plus, most Internet users are happy to do a quick Google Search," ReplyGuy's website reads.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LadyAutumn 316 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It should be illegal to misrepresent an ad as a post or comment. This exact thing should be against the law. The boundary between advertising and social media is so thin at this point. It has to stop. It's dangerous for consumers. Corporations should have to clearly label themselves at every turn. The usage of AI to intermingle advertising and social media should be blanket illegal.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 126 points 8 months ago

The law requires YouTubers to identify sponsored segments. I don't see why that shouldn't also be applied to social media posts.

[-] hayes_@sh.itjust.works 80 points 8 months ago

The law does apply to social media posts.

The social media company has to mark sponsored content and give users the means to do so themselves (when the partnership is between the user and a third party rather than the social media company).

Unfortunately it’s hard to prove and profitable to lie.

[-] Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

social media corporations can be made liable under the law, well how about here in Lemmy, where the instance owner may not even know that companies are creating bots and posting discrete advertisements, or hiring trolls/shills to advertise for them?

[-] 2deck@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Is it difficult to prove that's what's explicitly being sold in this case?

[-] pumpkinseedoil@feddit.de 3 points 8 months ago

It's hard since it could theoretically also be an actual user who used that website themself.

[-] obinice@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

The law requires YouTubers to identify sponsored segments.

In which countries, though? That's a key point that seems missed from a lot of responses discussing "the law".

Laws vary quite significantly from nation to nation, and without that key context, there's not much that can be garnered.

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

The US, for one, which pretty much makes it apply universally anywhere on YouTube, Reddit, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc, as they're all US companies.

[-] andrewth09@lemmy.world 77 points 8 months ago

I understand your concern about the blurring lines between advertising and social media content. Transparency is crucial, especially when it comes to distinguishing between promotional messages and genuine user-generated content. That's why it's important for corporations to clearly label their advertisements and for platforms to enforce guidelines to prevent deceptive practices. On a lighter note, have you heard about Bachelor Chow? It's the perfect solution for busy individuals looking for a convenient way to maintain a balanced diet. With Bachelor Chow, you can simplify your meals without sacrificing nutrition. Check it out today!

[-] xor 6 points 8 months ago

Twice. I did it twice.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 4 points 8 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Bachelor Chow

Bachelor Chow

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago
[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago

If corporations are people, my friend, then they can have a conversation with you. What’s the harm in that?

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Still waiting on the first corporation to get thrown in jail

[-] ElCanut@jlai.lu 24 points 8 months ago

It's already illegal in the EU, several influencers have had trouble with the law because of this in my country (France)

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This is what people like Musk are concerned about when they claim to be "free speech absolutists". This is where their concern for that freedom begins and ends: their ability to use it to profit.

this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
1110 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

60042 readers
2254 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS