137
submitted 8 months ago by nekandro@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] xep@fedia.io 21 points 8 months ago

Why would they publish this information?

[-] Orbituary@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Posturing and psy-ops. It's likely an inflated figure.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 months ago

Possibly, I’m not sure how stealthy the F22 was to begin with. Possible if the baseline single radar signature is next to nothing, the 60,000 figure is easier to produce.

[-] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

The F22 is has the lowest radar cross section in the world as far as I'm aware, so... pretty stealthy.

[-] Liz@midwest.social 6 points 8 months ago

Basically they want people to think they're stronger and that the US is weaker. It's a PR campaign. The US almost certainly has had the same capability for a while and simply had no need to advertise.

Recognize that the US would be foolish to fly a stealth fighter/bomber within range where multiple radar could lock on. They'd start their attack campaigns from far out and pick off the known ground radar installations at the perimeter, along with downing aircraft that tried to intercept them. After that, the US would have air superiority and only have to worry about mobile radar units. In any case, once they turn the radar on to look for the planes, they're broadcasting their location and the plane can just launch a missile down their throat.

this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
137 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32500 readers
627 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS