1437
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

i still think timezones were a mistake, and that they shouldn't exist period. I have a long thread about this from an earlier post about timezones as well amusingly enough.

[-] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 46 points 6 months ago

As a social construct, I like that I can be anywhere in the world and know that around noon is probably an appropriate time for lunch, etc.

[-] nxdefiant@startrek.website 12 points 6 months ago

Time is an illusion, lunch time doubly so.

[-] rovingnothing29@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Is that where my sandwich went?

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 2 points 6 months ago

You life was an illusion, and you are the sandwich.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 months ago

there is no appropriate time for lunch. And besides you wanna know a better way to figure it out? Go outside.

[-] min_fapper@iusearchlinux.fyi 18 points 6 months ago

Yeah that doesn't work if you live in Seattle.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 months ago

damn, if only there was like, this thing, that tracked time. And it was like, relative to the solar time that we experience here on earth, but like, not explicitly that solar time, so you could just like, offset it slightly, to get the correct local solar time.

Man, what a difficult and challenging issue to solve.

[-] puppy@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago

Did you just describe timezones?

[-] rektdeckard@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

I think they're proposing personal time zones, where every individual's clock shows their precise solar time, and nobody ever manages to be on time to work ever again.

[-] towerful@programming.dev 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Good god, imagine 360 timezones to describe each longitude.
Each timezone would be 4 minutes, and span roughly 56 miles (tho, that's different as you get nearer the poles).
For the majority of things, it would be fine. Most appointments etc that are "booked" verbally would likely be within 56 miles, where "casual" time would work. Anything beyond that feels like a "significant" thing, which would probably involve written/digital communication - where computers could pick up the slack for translation.
And EVERYONE would be aware of timezones. So, even Microsoft/Excel would have to recognise that timezones are a real thing.

So, probably not that bad

[-] rektdeckard@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I'm imagining something more fluid, where the time it is depends on exactly where you're standing and the position of the sun in relation to it. You'd need to factor the direction you're traveling as well as the distance whenever you went anywhere. We'd have a lot more intimate relationship with our current celestial situation.

[-] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

that's basically why timezones were created. before then, every town had its own local time.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago

close, there's a regional local solar time (you could just steal timezones for this one) and then there is global time, which is what we go by for everything. Local solar time is essentially just an offset to the global time for the relative nature of local time to global time.

i like how whenever i mention this, people seem to think i want to get rid of time instead of timezones

[-] rektdeckard@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

What you're describing is LITERALLY the system we have. UTC is a global, coordinated time that tracks solar time to a precision of less than a second. As far as my computer is concerned, my time is UTC (technically GMT, but they both refer to the same time) minus 6 hours. We all could choose to say, "hey, wanna meet for dinner at 3AM?" and have that be a normal thing to say in my area, and an odd thing to say odd in Europe... but nobody wants that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago
[-] Glytch@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

It really seems like you're just describing time zones. Or do you mean that we should be even more granular about it and have personal timezones that adjust depending on where we are on the globe? That just seems like timezones with extra steps

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] puppy@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Can you give me an example with an example time and how 2 people in different countries would organise a meeting?

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr 5 points 6 months ago

Are you suggesting something like continuous timezones? Thanks for bringing this nightmare to a whole new level! :)

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 points 6 months ago

You mean like a watch that goes by timezones? 🤔

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dondelelcaro@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Unless you're in Tibet, Xinjiang, or another place observing UTC+8 with a significant offset from local solar time.

[-] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 6 months ago

They had their chance. Heck, they still have their chance. They will continue to have their chance.

[-] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 42 points 6 months ago

Imagine you're watching a movie, and the main character turns over to their bedside clock and it shows 4:13 am. With time zones we all understand what part of the day that is and instinctively can relate to the situation.

Without timezones, every locality would have a different shorthand and cultural understanding of what times mean what. Or they'd adopt a second system that helps transcend that but that's just inventing timezones again...

[-] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 12 points 6 months ago

I reluctantly agree with you. Though I think the reluctance is just because there's something in me that's viscerally offended by the concept of time itself (probably the ADHD)

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 months ago

actually, this is pretty funny. This is the ONE instance so far, that i've found where timezones actually do something productive, and it's in a movie.

Too bad movies never use shit like ambient moon lighting, or darkness. It's not like those convey what time of night it is or anything. I mean seriously, if you're bound to showing a clock to display the time, rather than make a point, you're not a very good writer.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] okamiueru@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

Are you thinking about daylight savings time? I'd agree there, but timezones absolutely make sense, and we've always used some version of it. "See you at noon" has a sort of built in timezone, as does sunrise and sunset. We (all human societies) relate hours to the day in a similar, albeit more regular way. If you did away with timezones, you'd replace a minor inconvenience with a monstrous one. Everyone uses what, GMT? Naah

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 months ago

DST definitely isn't helping, but in my experience, DST only makes this stuff more arbitrary, between the winter and the summer here where i live, the sunset can vary up to about 4 hours based on season. Time is entirely arbitrary in relation to the sun to begin with. It's a lived experience that many of us have.

And while we do use things like morning, noon, afternoon, evening, night, and midnight. Those are all relative to the local solar time, not the actual time. Sure noon being at 12 is kind of nice i guess. But noon is noon, the time on the clock doesn't change that.

[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 16 points 6 months ago

Time zones are fine. Daylight Savings Time needs to be taken out behind the wood shed and killed with a spoon.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 13 points 6 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] vfye@toast.ooo 5 points 6 months ago

I like it when i miss the train because town A's time is way off from toen C's time

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 months ago

sounds like a skill issue to be honest.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ashok36@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I honestly can't tell if you are pro or anti time zones from this comment.

[-] towerful@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago

Nobody likes missing a train.
In this scenario, missing a train is caused by timezones.
It's sarcasm. So against timezones.
Maybe, against more granular timezones, ok with status-quo, but would be happy if all official correspondence happened with UTC.
Possibly completely against timezones.
Maybe a mix of all of the above

[-] 1917isnow@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

I think it would be intuitive to people after a while

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago

it's the less arbitrary version of having timezones, the only difference is that the time doesn't change, because it doesn't it's the solar time that changes.

this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
1437 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

19471 readers
1116 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS