565
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] roomboy@lemmy.world 42 points 7 months ago

You get 45 grams according to the package. It's more cost effective for them to just put it in the same packaging as the regular sized and just change the label rather than shut down and change the production line to accommodate the smaller size.

[-] Tagger@lemmy.world 53 points 7 months ago

I get that, but from an environmental point of view, this is an absolute travesty.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

I guess that could go for deodorant overall. It's not a very necessary product.

[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

Environment problems are only affected by necessary products? If people use it, then it is making pollution

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

Unnecessary products create unnecessary environmental problems... Didn't think that needed clarifying lol

[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Then there are unnecessary products creating more pollution and less pollution

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago
[-] kadu@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago

And of course the fact this obviously creates the illusion there's more product and therefore can trick customers it's just a happy accident, right?

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Well, by a trully, utterly AMAZING coincidence....

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

That doesn't change the fact its misleading. Not everyone walks around with a god damn scale, knows the average weights of deodorant off the top of their head. The average person is going to look at this and assume its full and that's how the manufacturer wants it.

ackshually if you get out your scales and do a little homework..

no. fuck you.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 10 points 7 months ago

So you, I dunno, read the label where it shows the net weight, and compare it to other similar products nearby on the same shelf? Hell, most store shelf pricing has price per unit on it now, so you can compare prices pretty directly. Yeah, I get that it's not completely consistent where that's implemented, but it's far and away better than the days of "price gun sticker on item and that's it."

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Which boils down to 'make sure you look hard to see how they are trying to trick you'

And, in that scenario...you blame the people who don't catch the trick as opposed to the corporation trying to trick people.

[-] wellee@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

I certainly do not do that. Who has time to inspect every item they buy nowadays? Ridiculous.

[-] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

Could also be a function thing too. My travel deodorant has an amount that is 3 times smaller and it kinda sucks to hold.

[-] Album@lemmy.ca 16 points 7 months ago

Yes they even have to consider things like accessibility for disabled. It's not all trickery. Not to say shrinkflation isn't a problem I don't want to ruin the circle jerk but not everything fits.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

They still have to ship the empty packaging. You have to wonder if it’s really worth it to the company to package and ship air. The missing deodorant gel probably costs pennies to manufacture.

this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
565 points (100.0% liked)

AssholeDesign

7544 readers
1 users here now

This is a community for designs specifically crafted to make the experience worse for the user. This can be due to greed, apathy, laziness or just downright scumbaggery.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS