1001
submitted 7 months ago by hsr@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] queue 14 points 7 months ago

They are one and the same. If you knew where to look, they provided means.

Tools are agnostic to their use. Tools do not have a preference how they are used. Hammers that are used are agnostic to if they are hammering a nail into a wall or caving in a skull. Yuzu would work exactly the same if you dumped your own carts. Same for emulators for Genesis and Atari 2600 and PlayStation.

What’s wrong with Twitter? You could also just google this and find the information yourself, don’t know why I have to provide what should be common knowledge on this subject.

If you make a claim, you need to provide the evidence. That's how these things work. You say a claim, you give us the proof. And I can say on Twitter "Yuzu was 100000% legal and Nintendo actually is the real illegal operation". Now that's a valid source too, right?

They were not a legal emulator, full stop, sorry.

https://www.eff.org/issues/coders/reverse-engineering-faq

Sorry but that biggest technology legal experts and defenders of the little guys who get sued by the big companies you polish the boots with your tongue strongly prove you wrong.

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Uhhh they didn’t reverse engineer the key they used, that’s the entire stickler here…..

And the Twitter thread had the sources, so why are you saying the onus is on me? I provided it, even though it should be common knowledge.

this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
1001 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45646 readers
1238 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS