276
What apps would you love to have open-source alternatives for? (lemmy.world)
submitted 6 months ago by ClearCutCoconut@lemmy.world to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
408 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It seems like the FOSS community is continuing to grow, and FOSS apps keep getting better (Immich reallh blew my mind recently), which is a big win 😎 but there are still many apps I use that I would kill for an open source alternative. I am curious what you guys think? Are there any apps you'd love alternatives for?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 120 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Discord. It's extremely popular and has no direct alternatives (Matrix spaces thing isn't ready at all yet)

EDIT: I didn't know Revolt and Zulip existed. I'm doing a research on them now

[-] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 45 points 6 months ago

Matrix is also extremely complicated to sign up for. I tried getting some tech savvy friends to sign up for Matrix the other day. Even for someone tech-savvy it is waaaaaaaay too complicated. Many of the clients don't even have a sign up option, you need to sign up elsewhere first.

[-] ClearCutCoconut@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago

Yeah...for many of these programs the onboarding is so daunting, even for those who are tech savvy. Laymen don't stand a chance with something that is that complicated. It doesn't often seem to be a technical issue either, more-so a user experience or design problem

[-] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 24 points 6 months ago

It doesn’t often seem to be a technical issue either, more-so a user experience or design problem

Oh 100%. The problem is that there's a lack of UX designers and such in the Open Source community. There's technical people building stuff but they often don't know how to make a good user experience (or in some cases they don't care to).

[-] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 6 months ago

IDK why this always gets downvoted. UI/UX some of the biggest issues with FOSS software, and is a massive barrier to entry to someone who isn't a massive computer nerd willing to put up with that shit.

[-] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 6 points 6 months ago

I guess they take any criticism of open source as if you are against the whole movement. I don't understand either.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago

honestly i don't even think it's a FOSS problem, this is a problem with every UI ever made in the last three years essentially.

Unless it's literally making money off of you having an account, there is no incentive to design a good UI from the ground up. The solution here ironically, is simply don't skill issue, or document it very well.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago

personally when it comes to the onboarding im more on the side of "self host your own onboarding, for friends and family and shit, and then federate out from there if needed."

Theoretically doing a clean onboarding shouldn't be very difficult. More involved i suppose, but if you don't have the time to figure out how a federated instance works, (or to properly document it) you shouldn't be on the internet, you have more pressing matters to attend to.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 months ago

There are instances that are not very hard to sign up for. The main issue with Matrix is instability and performance, especially when communicating with users/groups on different instances. It's really not a great experience. And the inability to properly delete messages can be a big deal too

[-] halm@leminal.space 6 points 6 months ago

Many of the clients don’t even have a sign up option, you need to sign up elsewhere first.

It's inconvenient, sure, but think of it as an assurance that you're not locked in with one app.

That said, I completely agree that Matrix and Element need to work on UX, particularly making it easy for new users to adopt it as well as verification/device switching.

[-] chebra@mstdn.io 6 points 6 months ago

@SorteKanin I'd like to see that. I have already onboarded about 35 students and my whole family to matrix, nobody had any problems with signup. Bigger problem is later if they get the infamous "Unable to decrypt message" error.

[-] astro_ray@lemdro.id 1 points 6 months ago

Yeah. I still don't understand all the encryption stuff. I lost all my encrypted texts even after I used my recovery pass phrase on a new session.

[-] metacolon 5 points 6 months ago

Can't relate. It's not harder to get your hands on a matrix account in comparison to a mail account. And for those that want it even easier, just download Element and you are guided through the default registration at matrix.org

[-] FrostKing@lemmy.world 34 points 6 months ago

I keep hearing people recommend signal messenger as an alternative to discord, and honestly that's the most obvious sign you don't actually use discord

[-] tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.net 5 points 6 months ago

Yeah signal is amazing for one to one or small groups, but not for what discord servers are used for.

[-] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 3 points 6 months ago

But to be honest, many discord servers are used for things they really shouldn't be used for... Like code documentation and bug tracking

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago

Well some people use Discord as a messenger for some reason and for them Signal is probably the best but yea it's not a Discord alternative at all

[-] MultipleAnimals@sopuli.xyz 16 points 6 months ago

Revolt is very promising, not ready yet but already feels very similar to Discord

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 months ago

The privacy policy of their app's captcha solution is horrendous so no thank you

[-] Devorlon@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago

Doesn't seem that bad, when you go to log in it checks your IP, length of time on the site and mouse movements.

hCaptcha

This section has been adapted from hCaptcha's documentation.

We use the hCaptcha anti-bot service (hereinafter "hCaptcha") on our website. This service is provided by Intuition Machines, Inc., a Delaware US Corporation ("IMI"). hCaptcha is used to check whether the data entered on our website (such as on a login page or contact form) has been entered by a human or by an automated program. To do this, hCaptcha analyzes the behavior of the website or mobile app visitor based on various characteristics. This analysis starts automatically as soon as the website or mobile app visitor enters a part of the website or app with hCaptcha enabled.

When using the Revolt App, hCaptcha will only begin analysis when you:

Submit a login request.
Submit a registration request.
Submit a password reset / email resend request.

For the analysis, hCaptcha evaluates various information (e.g. IP address, how long the visitor has been on the website or app, or mouse movements made by the user). The data collected during the analysis will be forwarded to IMI.

Data processing is based on Art. 6(1)(f) of the GDPR (DSGVO): the website or mobile app operator has a legitimate interest in protecting its site from abusive automated crawling and spam. IMI acts as a "data processor" acting on behalf of its customers as defined under the GDPR, and a "service provider" for the purposes of the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). For more information about hCaptcha and IMI's privacy policy and terms of use, please visit the following links: https://hcaptcha.com/privacy/ and https://hcaptcha.com/terms.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

The Revolt's policy is not that bad. Look at the hCaptcha's one

[-] Devorlon@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago

That's the part of hCaptchas policy that's relevant to Revolt.

For the analysis, hCaptcha evaluates various information (e.g. IP address, how long the visitor has been on the website or app, or mouse movements made by the user). The data collected during the analysis will be forwarded to IMI.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Did you miss these parts or are they inapplicable?

How We Use Information We use the information we collect for the following purposes: To administer Integrator and Customer accounts and provide the Service. We use Personal Information in order to associate specific accounts with Integrators and Customers and to provide them the Service, to respond to requests or inquiries, to provide support or technical assistance, and to facilitate payments. To improve to Site and the Service. We use Analytics Information to improve our existing and develop new services and offerings and to customize existing and future product offerings. To derive market insights. We use Analytics Information to analyze the market and conduct business analyses related to the Site and our Services, and for other research purposes. To provide a market for Labeled Data. Our Service enables high volume data labeling and human review for machine learning systems as a service to website owners and companies who need help getting their data labeled. To that end, we disclose Labeled Data to our Customers interested in acquiring Labeled Data. To secure our services and systems. We use Analytics Information to secure our systems by identifying potential threats and vulnerabilities, and to otherwise protect the information we collect. For any legitimate business purpose, provided that the information is de-identified or aggregated such that it cannot be reasonably tied to an individual.

How We Share Information We share or disclose personal information in the following cases: Upon direct request from an Integrator to identify the fraud risk of a specific CAPTCHA challenge request or IP address, or otherwise where specific consent was given. With vendors we engage to provide essential aspects of the Sites and the Service, such as data storage, hosting, and Analytics, and only for those purposes. As necessary to comply with applicable law, including governmental requests, law enforcement requests, and otherwise to public and private entities in order to protect the rights, privacy, safety, or property of you, us, or others. With others for any legitimate business purpose, provided the information is de-identifiedor aggregated such that it cannot be reasonably tied to an individual.

Disclosure Regarding "Sales" of Personal Information under the CCPA. In the preceding twelve months, IMI has not "sold" any Personal Information (as defined by the CCPA), nor does IMI have actual knowledge of any "sale" of Personal Information of minors under 16 years of age (so they do sell information of people over 16). Disclosure Regarding "Sharing" for "Cross-Context Behavioral Advertising" under the CCPA. In the preceding twelve months, IMI has not "shared" any Personal Information for "cross-context behavioral advertising" (as such terms are defined in the CCPA), nor does IMI have actual knowledge of any "sharing" of Personal Information of minors under 16 years of age for "cross-context behavioral advertising".

[-] Devorlon@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago

I based my assumptions on the parts in Revolts privacy policy, since reading the privacy policy of hCatpcha it alludes that each 'vendor' can select how much data they'd like to collect I assumed that Revolt only allowed them to collect IP, length of time on site and mouse movements. While they do sell information, they claim it to be anonymised and I contacted support to see how they did that for IP addresses.

Which is why I don't really mind. The information they have of me is at most how my cursor moved, how long I took to Submit a login request, Submit a registration request, Submit a password reset / email resend request and an obfuscated IP. Seems OK to me.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

Tbh I forgot about the part about vendors limiting the data. I was focused on other ones. And I think Revolt itself is pretty trustworthy so they should limit it (hopefully). I guess I'll try it. I really want to be a part of good open-source projects

[-] Devorlon@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago

I really want to be a part of good open-source projects

I get it, though I try to remind myself that perfection is the enemy of good. Especially in comparison to Discord which makes its money through [???] and is somehow only getting worse.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Discord is a commercial proprietary product with questionable owners. Of course it's getting worse all the time

[-] ClearCutCoconut@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Especially with the upcoming implementation of ads. Really sucks that many communities and software support (who should have just had forums) are deeply embedded into it and will have to start from scratch and lose any and all helpful content. Its hard to see big communities moving to anything else anytime soon, even of there was a great Foss alternative. It would indeed be amazing to have one in the first place

[-] brrt@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I think what’s even worse than ads is many channels now require verification through a phone number if you want to write something. Not sure when that became a thing but I just recently ran into this roadblock and noped tf out.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

I thought the Discord ads drama was an April Fools joke?

[-] ClearCutCoconut@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

You had me for a second, lol. Unfortunately it is not an April fools joke :/ luckily for us though, the worse the application gets, the higher a chance a Foss alternative will emerge from a madlad who was sick of discord's shit

https://adguard.com/en/blog/ads-discord-blocking-adguard.html

[-] Damage@feddit.it 8 points 6 months ago

Adoption is always the main issue, as we can see here on the Fediverse. It's crazy how even technically-inclined people flock to discord. So many 3d printing communities are on there, people who install custom debian distros on raspberry pis, solder wires, crimp connectors and assemble open source machines, still fall into the trap.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Hmm I really hope so

[-] majestictechie@lemmy.fosshost.com 9 points 6 months ago

https://zulip.com/ is likely your best alternative. It's more a Slack copy than Discord but the features are there

[-] vort3@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago

If you're talking about voice channels specifically, then there is Mumble.

If you're talking about chat rooms, old school solution is IRC and we have XMPP that works fine for most people.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

No I meant an app that looks similar and contains most of the features (servers specifically) so it's easier for not tech savvy users to get into. Someone suggested Revolt but its privacy (as in sending the data to not privacy respecting third parties) is questionable so idk if I can consider it a good enough alternative

[-] techognito@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Something like Revolt could maybe be a replacement for discord

[-] metacolon 4 points 6 months ago

Lol

[-] astro_ray@lemdro.id 1 points 6 months ago

There is a project, but it's really early in it's development. It's called Cabal. Has a nice desktop client, looks kinda like Discord. It's p2p, so no server required. BUT AGAIN, VERY EARLY IN DEVELOPMENT.

https://github.com/cabal-club

Not something you should use, but look out for how the development is going.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

There seem to be quite a few projects. It's slowing the development down. It would be better if everyone focused on one. But peer to peer is interesting. I'm wondering how much disk space it will use a day if I'm in a group with like 100k people though

this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
276 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

30967 readers
360 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Cloak@lemmy.ml
kevincox@lemmy.ml
CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml