1451
bOtH SiDeS!!1! (i.imgur.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 23 points 8 months ago

Not sure where you got the implication from that he shouldn't stop supporting genocide?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

Right here on lemmy. Try saying that Biden should stop supporting genocide here on lemmy a few times. You'll get plenty of people acting like you're both-sidesing for Trump.

[-] null@slrpnk.net 14 points 8 months ago

Only if you add in a splash of "so I'm not voting for him".

No one is shouting down people for just saying Biden should stop supporting genocide.

[-] OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

I can tell you with 100% certainty that this is not true

[-] null@slrpnk.net 8 points 8 months ago

I can tell you with 100% certainty that it is.

Wow, that was easy!

[-] OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Someone posts news about Biden walking back on his sanctions on settlers, and this comment appears. Edit, doesn't work for me, maybe this link to my reply will

Another perfect example and another

Someone makes a meme about Biden jeopardizing his chances and gets this response.

None of these people said they would vote trump. If you look out for it you will see this quite often. Unfortunately a couple of recent threads I was involved in with other examples have since been deleted.

[-] null@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 months ago

I can't read some of those without creating an account, so I'll take your word for it.

But from the ones I can see, I don't see anyone acting like someone who claimed Biden should stop supporting genocide is both-sidesing for Trump.

The one that comes closest was downvoted and removed, so it's obviously not a popular thing to do.

[-] OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Someone in one example is complaining that the DNC ignores progressives, not saying they will vote for Trump. The response containing this has 10 net upvotes:

It seems you're suggesting that the fallout from another Trump presidency will lead to better long term results than a second Biden presidency?

What happens to Ukraine after you stick it to the man and support Trump?

Honestly it will continue in future and now you will notice it.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

He already noticed it and is gaslighting.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

If you say "biden should stop supporting genocide" then you'll get "but the other guy supports genocide even harder" to shut down any discussion. If you point out that it's unacceptable that the only two options are genocide supporters, that's definitely when you get the "you're both sidesing!!" talking point in another attempt to shut down discussion.

[-] null@slrpnk.net 6 points 8 months ago
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Thank you for letting me know that I must be lying about my lived experience.

[-] null@slrpnk.net 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Go ahead, share some examples then. Back yourself up. Should be simple if it's so common.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

You get one. I suspect you're arguing in bad faith and I'm not going to waste more time on something like that.

https://lemmy.world/comment/8972976

Particularly sailingbythelee's response. When you try to say this isn't sufficient, it will confirm that you were arguing in bad faith the entire time.

[-] OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

You could not have found a better example.

Original position of the goalposts:

No one is shouting down people for just saying Biden should stop supporting genocide.

Now all of a sudden the downvotes are the most important part

[-] null@slrpnk.net 3 points 8 months ago

Oh the commenter who's being downvoted? Yeah, it's obviously not a prevalent or popular response. At best you're complaining about trolls on the internet -- that's always going to exist.

Oh, and before I forget, if you say that's not what you're doing, then it will confirm you were arguing in bad faith the entire time.

That's for teaching me that cool trick with that disclaimer -- what a neat way to discredit people.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Oh the commenter who’s being downvoted?

Look at those goalposts move.

[-] null@slrpnk.net 1 points 8 months ago

So you were literally just pointing out that dumb people say dumb things and get down voted for it?

Gee, how insightful.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

And now you're lying about what I said.

[-] null@slrpnk.net 1 points 8 months ago

And now you're lying about what I said.

this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
1451 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5598 readers
1430 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS