1467
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

It’s definitely subjective. Some people don’t mind having the speedometer off to the right on a touch screen display. Personally I do not. It’s poor design choice for my personal flavor for interacting with the car. The same with the shifter.

My prior car, a Toyota Prius, also had the center-placed speedometer. So that's not a Tesla only thing. I thought it would bother me. It didn't end up doing so.

The same with the shifter.

Every shifter prior to 2024 Model 3 has the shifter on a stalk. Thats been a staple of cars since the 1950s. I'm not a fan of buttons for shifting, nor touchscreen. Both require you to take your eyes off the windshield.

So far GM has the worst design for shifting IMO. Its a set of pull levers under the HVAC controls!

You have to tilt your head nearly looking at your lap they are so low to find them, further there is a small cut out that accommodates a single finger you have to find to put your finger in and pull the lever back to engage that function. So when pulling out of a parking spot on a bright sunny day where your eyes are used to looking outside, you now have to look at a wall of a back dashboard and find that little hole to stick your finger in, pull it, remove your finger to back out turning the wheel, then do that same search and eye adjustment all over again to find the "drive" lever. I had this on a rental car once. I avoid all GM rental cars now on the off chance they do this stupidity too.

That setup is so bad, it makes a touch screen gear change a better choice, and I would hate to have a touch screen function for that. Its at least at near eye level, so you don't have to fumble in the coin tray feeling for it. Its also backlit so you don't have to wait for your eyes to adjust to the darkness to make the change.

If that’s your biggest complaint for gimmick then I think it’s a leap.

This is the second time your taking a statement I've said and made it seem more aggressive on my part, and I don't know why. The first was when I asked you what kind of car you had, and you automatically said I'd say it was bad, and now this one where I even already stated that these were very small complaints. I pointed them out because they were small on an otherwise good car. If feels like you think I'm attacking you, where I have not done so in any of our posts between us. Why are you doing that?

My concern are the design gimmicks of the rest of the car. Tesla could have the greatest quality EV tech and I couldn’t give a fuck less because I think their door handles and giant touchscreens are fucking stupid.

You're welcome to your opinion of course. There are certainly design and implementation choices I don't like on Tesla cars. There are lots of things missing on non-BEV cars today in my opinion too. However, I haven't found a perfect car yet. So its a choice of measuring the pros and cons of a vehicle with respect to our own tastes and judging on total balance whether its one you like or not. We've both done this calculus and arrived at different answers, and there's nothing wrong with either of our takes because they are right for our own personal experiences.

[-] guacupado@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Half of this thread is people who would never have been getting an EV in general. Just complaining to complain and parroting the most popular clickbait points.

this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
1467 points (100.0% liked)

News

23616 readers
2908 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS