254
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Progressives aim to reinstate equilibrium to state’s lopsided politics that DeSantis has, in the eyes of some, dragged into fascism

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GiddyGap@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Florida is different because so many older, more conservative retirees move to Florida. And they vote. If it wasn't for that, Florida would probably have been pretty solidly blue at this point.

On the other hand, that has opened up other states for Democrats, e.g. Michigan and Pennsylvania.

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Florida is red because of gerrymandering.

Biden lost the popular vote in Florida by one or two percent. IRC De Santis won the state by less than 1%. Voters have often and overwhelmingly voted in favour of 'left-wing' ballot initiatives too.

It should be a swing state.

In any case, conservative retirees may be moving to Florida, but they're also mor likely to leave Florida and this mortal coil than the average voter.

[-] coffeetest@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

Or on occasion, the Supreme Court decides that Fla votes R for them.

[-] Unaware7013@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

And wouldn't you know it, some of the people in that case are now on the court

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 10 points 1 year ago

*illegal gerrymandering

Let's not forget, Florida passed an anti-gerrymandering law. DeSantis straight up ignored it

[-] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Florida is red because of gerrymandering.

50% of Florida voters couldn't be bothered to go vote in the last election. Stop thinking that everything can be blamed on gerrymandering. In even the most heavily gerrymandered districts, Dems could win if only they could get voters off their asses and out to the polls. To be clear, I am NOT saying it isn't an issue, but I am sick of far too many on the Left using gerymandering or the EC as their crutch as to why they lose elections when they do not have a focused platform or compelling candidates in far too many races.

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You have a point.

I suspect going on about gerrymandering too much, and inadvertently convincing some democratic voters they can't win because of gerry mandering, isn't helping either.

[-] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It becomes a crutch... "oh, why should we bother to go vote, when we know we will lose?" or worse yet, it undermines democracy in general by making people think the system is totally rigged. Those are the kinds of arguments that clowns like Trump use. I am not saying that everything is fair. Far from it, but apathy is one of the biggest weapons that fascist use to make people not want to go vote. Voter turnout is already pitiful - we can't afford to lose more voters.

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah. I have a related degree and this is the kind of thing Cambridge Analytica did. Big data scraping, pop it all into SPSS to see what predicts voting behaviour, then target voter demographics that'll vote against your client with propaganda that makes them cynical.

It's really hard to make them vote for your guy, it's easier to convince them to not vote against him.

Hell, I'd argue that even if the system is largely rigged, you need the electorate to believe the lie that it's not, to at least stand at least some chance at keeping the fascists out.

But what do I know.

[-] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Democrats also chase after middle class votes when they should be in every fast food joint, retail chain, and other shitty minimum wage job, advocating for inflation-tied minimum wage increases, strengthened protections for organized labor, etc.

(they don't do this because they are a centrist party that doesn't want the US to have the quality of life enjoyed by those in Western Europe)

[-] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

This is such bullshit that blames voters instead of blaming political parties for failing to reach them and speak to their needs and issues. Democrats would get voters to the polls if they gave them something to vote FOR as opposed to AGAINST. Isn't it always interesting that a Republican minority in government seems to exert power and influence that their Democratic minority counterparts can't? Democrats are woefully inept at combating fascism and I hold them responsible for the likes of Desantis after years of compromising with a cabal of theocatic nationalists that have been hell-bent on turning the US into Christian Iran.

"Vote for me and your life won't get any worse than it already is!" is not inspiring, and fear only motivates the people directly in the line of fire and the most empathetic of others.

[-] insomniac@vlemmy.net 2 points 1 year ago

Desantis was re-elected with almost 60% of the vote. Trump did only win by less than 2% but turnout was almost 30% lower in 2022 than it was in 2020.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He won by less than a percentage point in 2018. When he ran against Charlie Crist in 2022 he won with close to 60%, but that was more about Crist being a garbage candidate who stumped for Sarah Palin happily in 2008 but decided the Republican party was irredeemable in 2010 (after he lost a Republican primary to Marco Rubio). Run someone who isn't a transparent hack against DeSantis and he's totally beatable, even with Florida voters.

[-] insomniac@vlemmy.net 7 points 1 year ago

Maybe but the one thing I’ve learned in my time as an American is that any time you’re counting on Florida for anything, you’re gonna be very disappointed.

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago
this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
254 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3477 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS