582
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] alternative_factor@kbin.social 172 points 7 months ago

The UN passed the resolution calling it genocide so I agree with that, I trust a democratic vote of the UN despite their inability to actually do anything compared to South Africa. I'm still going to vote Biden though because I know about project 2025 and know that we will probably get genocided in our own country if he loses. It sucks but that's how I feel.

[-] index@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago

I’m still going to vote Biden though because I know about project 2025 and know that we will probably get genocided in our own country if he loses. It sucks but that’s how I feel.

Instead of picking between a genocide and another you should just vote for someone else and don't support any criminal.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Stein says that Russia had no other choice but to invade Ukraine and commit genocide there, and Cornel West has a similar position I believe.

If you don't want to vote for a genocide apologist, you basically can't vote.

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 1 points 7 months ago

>Stein says that Russia had no other choice but to invade Ukraine and commit genocide there, and Cornel West has a similar position I believe.

neither of them said this. your comment is straight misinformation.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

https://twitter.com/DrJillStein/status/1629226431006875651?lang=en

"So yes, Russia illegally invaded Ukraine – but did so with a gun to its head, or in this case, nuclear-compatible missiles. Compared to the US mobilization for immediate nuclear war when roles were reversed w Russian nukes in Cuba, this response was relatively moderate."

She's went with the old "but NATO would be right there!" argument, which is pro imperialist apologia.

EDIT: I forgot Dr. West.

https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/2024-election/biden-war-criminal-cornel-west/

"When it comes to Ukraine, we must grasp the implications of NATO expansion and its potential to escalate into a catastrophic conflict,” West stated. He called for an end to the war in Ukraine and urged diplomatic negotiations to ensure both Russian security and Ukrainian freedom."

Once again, a pro imperialist argument that Ukraine isn't allowed to do what it wants because it would piss off it's former colonizer. And a pro imperialist argument that we know better than Ukraine and they should stop fighting because we said so, even though they want to keep fighting.

[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

calling for an end of the war is not pro-russian. you are providing evidence against your own position and then lying about what the evidence says.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

It certainly is if Ukraine wants to continue fighting to reclaim their own land.

Let Ukraine decide, and support them in whatever their decision is.

[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

i'm an anarchist, and i don't believe states should exist at all. there are people living in the region called ukraine. i want them to live without any government, russian or ukranian.

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 1 points 7 months ago

being antinato is being anti-imperialist.

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 1 points 7 months ago

i love that you shared that thread. anyone can see she opposes war and genocide just by reading your link.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Yes because surrendering to genocidal maniacs is the "anti war" position.

And in this case, being anti NATO is being pro imperialist. Russia is angry that a former colony is going against them. NATO is supporting the colony against their former colonizers. Suggesting that the colonists stop fighting and do whatever the colonizers want is pro imperialism, and it's what Stein and West are supporting.

No support for Israel. No support for Russia. No support for colonizers. Any "leftist" against Palestinian and Ukrainian aid is a wolf in sheep's clothing.

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 1 points 7 months ago

>Suggesting that the colonists stop fighting and do whatever the colonizers want

no one said that

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

So Stein has a brilliant negotiation tactic that will succeed where everyone else has failed, and it will lead to Russia completely withdrawing and paying for rebuilding Ukraine?

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

she might. i don't honestly know.

is that your standard for biden, too?

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Yep. Anything short of Russia's total retreat is unacceptable, and ideally they'll be forced to pay reparations as well.

Something often forgotten by the "stop the war now" crowd is that the war could be over tomorrow if Russia withdrew. This war only exists because Russia invaded another country to stop their sovereignty. The war ends if Russia leaves and respects Ukraine's sovereignty.

Would you find it acceptable if Biden negotiated a deal where the Palestinian genocide would stop if half of Gaza fell under Israel's total control? I certainly wouldn't. You don't give oppressors a reward.

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 1 points 7 months ago

>Would you find it acceptable if Biden negotiated a deal where the Palestinian genocide would stop if half of Gaza fell under Israel’s total control?

gaza is under israels total control and has been for decades. and of course i want the dissolution of israel, just as i want the dissolution of russia, ukraine, the usa, britain, china, etc.

i want a world where everyone is equal and everyone is free.

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 1 points 7 months ago

>Yep.

he has not made any progress toward that, nor has he even stated it as a goal.

so you're not going to vote for him, are you?

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 1 points 7 months ago

>Anything short of Russia’s total retreat is unacceptable

if it were up to me there would be no russia

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 1 points 7 months ago

she called the invasion illegal, and the only extent to which your comment is correct, cornel west agrees with **that**.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I've responded to your other comment.

[-] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Possible genocide in the USA should one of the two viable presidential candidates gets elected?

Will the democrats stop pursuing gun control considering this imminent threat of genocide?

SocialistRA.org

this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
582 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3875 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS