20
Westminster Voting Intention: LAB: 51% (+3) | CON: 25% (-1) | LDEM: 8% (-) | SNP 3% (-1) | REF: 5% (-2) | GRN: 5% (-) | Via Omnisis (twitter.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by that_ginger_one@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Westminster voting intention:

๐Ÿ”ด Lab 51% (+3)

๐Ÿ”ต Con 25% (-1)

๐ŸŸ  LD 8% (NC)

๐ŸŸก SNP 3% (-1)

โšช Ref 5% (-2)

๐ŸŸข Green 5% (NC)

via @Omnisis , 06 - 07 Jul

Busy day for polling, and another big but increasing lead for Labour

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] that_ginger_one@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Flavible:

Party Pred % Pred Seats
CON ๐ŸŒณ 25.0% 129
LAB ๐ŸŒน 51.0% 435
LD ๐Ÿ”ถ 8.0% 29
REFUK โžก๏ธ 5.0% 0
Green ๐ŸŒ 5.0% 1
SNP ๐ŸŽ—๏ธ 3% 31
PC ๐Ÿ’ฎ 0.5% 3

Electoral Calculus (2023 Boundaries'):

Party 2019 Votes 2019 Seats Pred Votes Gains Losses Net Change Pred Seats
CON ๐ŸŒณ 44.7% 376 25.0% 1 325 -324 52
LAB ๐ŸŒน 33.0% 197 51.0% 338 0 +338 535
LIB ๐Ÿ”ถ 11.8% 8 8% 8 0 +8 16
Reform โžก๏ธ 2.1% 0 7% 0 0 +0 0
Green ๐ŸŒ 2.8% 1 6% 0 0 +0 1
SNP ๐ŸŽ—๏ธ 4.0% 48 3.5% 0 15 -23 25
PlaidC ๐Ÿ’ฎ 0.5% 2 0.4% 1 1 +0 2
Other โฌœ๏ธ 1.1% 0 2.0% 1 0 +1 1
N.Ire โฌœ๏ธ - 18 - 0 0 +0 18
[-] zabil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Con with 1/10th the seats of Labour. What a day that would be.

[-] that_ginger_one@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

Those poor LibDems though...

[-] mron@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The UK is effectively an entrenched two party system by design rather than by democratic means.

this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
20 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3070 readers
76 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
tom@feddit.uk
GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
flamingos@feddit.uk