209
Biden signs $1.2tn spending package as government shutdown is averted
(www.theguardian.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2024
209 points (100.0% liked)
politics
19126 readers
1950 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Biden doing all he can to throw the fucking election away.
Hed rather have trump in the White House than one less genocide against brown people.
If Trump is as big of threat to America as Biden says (and I agree with Biden there) then the only explanation is Biden has more loyalty to Israel then America. There's no threat to Israel's existence, if they stopped the genocide everything would go back to how it was 10/6.
But if Trump gets elected we might not have another election.
I see you don’t understand how Congress works. You see, in America we don’t have a dictator who can do whatever the fuck he wants. I know things may be different where you’re from.
Does a budget take effect without the president's signature?
I thought I knew, but apparently you're the expert.
Edit:
Here's an example of Biden acting without going through Congress, and it's topical too
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-congress-deal-bars-us-funds-unrwa-until-march-2025-sources-say-2024-03-19/
All three, House, Senate and President, need to agree to the same budget. As Republicans control (on paper) everything but the presidency it's not like Biden has true agency. If he grandstands on the UNRWA funding here the shutdown that would follow would be squarely on Biden. Thousands of American government employees wouldn't be paid and people relying on the federal government for aid and support would be out in the cold.
The fact of the matter is that the average American voter care more about the US doing well and everything working than they do about Palestine in general and the UNRWA funding specifically.
...
You legitimately believe Biden is reluctant?
He literally led the charge and banned the aid himself till it could be passed legislatively...
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-congress-deal-bars-us-funds-unrwa-until-march-2025-sources-say-2024-03-19/
You're being downvoted here because you set the goalpost as "Biden shouldn't sign this pro-Israel, anti-palestine budget because he'll lose the election" when that is refuted you then move it to "Biden wants to sign this budget, you're dumb if you think he's reluctant". I don't think he's reluctant, but not because he today wants to block aid to UNRWA, because he as a life long career politician knows there's no such thing as a bill you support 100% if you reach 51% that's good enough.
Biden wants to defund UNRWA, that's why he didn't it on his own before Congress did with legislation.
That hurts him with voters with a sense of empathy.
Implying Biden is reluctant to defend UNRWA has zero basis in reality.
And the justification used to defend it is more flawed than what lead to the Iraq war.
Shit has consequences. And it's often complicated, but I'm trying to communicate it as simply as possible.
It's not "moving the goalposts" it's addressing things as they come up because trying to cover everything in perfect detail wouldnt be a social media comment, it would be a serious of books so long no one is ever going to read it.
If different accounts bring up different specificities, they're going to get different explanations. Because there's lots of things that go into shit this complicated.
Well, let's be fair to Biden, Congress was supposed to have already given him the TikTok ban he also said he'd sign right away, and that would have shut up a lot of the people who complain about his support for an ongoing genocide
What?
You think if Biden banned TikTok it would make up for funding a genocide and refusing to help the victims?
Oh no, pretty much nothing they're doing is anything I want out of my government, I'm just saying that I think that their preferred strategy for dealing with critics of their policies would have been to shut down the social media those critics are most likely to use and it's left then a bit out of sorts not having the power to do that handed to them by Congress yet