13
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by lulztard@lemmy.wtf to c/guildwars2@lemmy.wtf

Less content of worse quality, but much more aggressively monetized? Half the content at the same price?

Anet axed Living World, rebranded it as "Mini Expansions" and is reselling it to us at full price. Complex mount system gets sidelined in favour of A mount to rule them all. Class skills and mechanics that have existed for years and years and years without issue are suddenly a problem and get gutted, dumbed down or removed. Classes get homogenised and simplified. Very little actually new systems get created, instead the existing game gets switched around as a much easier alternative. More focus on easy and cheap to develop daily/weekly content for whatever the current's expansion faction is.

I know that pattern.

I also know another pattern. SquareEnix. ActivisionBlizzard. NCNet.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nefonous@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, the powercreep is a totally legitimate concern since HoT Mounting in combat feels a bit cheap to me too, can be useful when going around gathering or stuff like that but maybe it's a little bit too convenient

this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
13 points (100.0% liked)

Guild Wars 2

1486 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to c/guildwars2 on the Lemmyverse.

SotM: Love Spooky Season (@avater)

Links

Official

Builds

Tools

Addons

Related Communities


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS