936

Kyle Rittenhouse storms off stage after being confronted by students (www.newsweek.com)

submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

485 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Kyle Rittenhouse abruptly departed the stage during an appearance at the University of Memphis on Wednesday, after he was confronted about comments made by Turning Point USA founder and president Charlie Kirk.

Rittenhouse was invited by the college's Turning Point USA chapter to speak at the campus. However, the event was met with backlash from a number of students who objected to Rittenhouse's presence.

The 21-year-old gained notoriety in August 2020 when, at the age of 17, he shot and killed two men—Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, as well as injuring 26-year-old Gaige Grosskreutz—at a protest in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

He said the three shootings, carried out with a semi-automatic AR-15-style firearm, were in self-defense. The Black Lives Matter (BLM) protest where the shootings took place was held after Jacob Blake, a Black man, was left paralyzed from the waist down after he was shot by a white police officer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 45 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Last I checked taking a gun to a place specifically to kill someone is murder, yup, even if our jurors decided they are not criminally liable , still a murderer, just not convicted.

[-] itsgoodtobeawake@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

I had a related conversation not long ago with a friend that took exception to me saying US troops "murder" people. His argument was that its a legal term and not accurate in that context. Which is probably true, but i dont think Im ever going to let go of killing people= murder regardless of what the law says.

[-] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Killing people = homicide

[-] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

i dont think Im ever going to let go of killing people= murder regardless of what the law says.

Not trying to change your mind one way or the other, but could I ask clarifying questions?

I'm sure you have a definition for what "killing" is to justify your beliefs, but like what is it?

Are drunks that kill people while they are blacked out murders?

What about giving someone peanuts that die from allergies? Does it matter if they didn't know about the allergy?

What about doctors killing people in the OR?

Or a baby killing their mom during childbirth?

Are all these people murders because they killed someone?

Wanted to edit real quick. I'm not trying to claim Rittenhouse didn't have a mindset to murder someone. Idk about what the legal definition is, he went there trying to kill someone so I could agree calling him a murder.

[-] III@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

The definition is "unlawful and premeditated". So for people in the military, definitely premeditated. Unlawful raises the interesting concept of "unlawful according to who". IMO, someone out there deems it unlawful.

[-] bloom_of_rakes@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

If you pay taxes then you might be considered an accessory to murder. Unless you consider taxes to be theft, of course.

this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024

936 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19118 readers

2643 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News