936
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Kyle Rittenhouse abruptly departed the stage during an appearance at the University of Memphis on Wednesday, after he was confronted about comments made by Turning Point USA founder and president Charlie Kirk.

Rittenhouse was invited by the college's Turning Point USA chapter to speak at the campus. However, the event was met with backlash from a number of students who objected to Rittenhouse's presence.

The 21-year-old gained notoriety in August 2020 when, at the age of 17, he shot and killed two men—Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, as well as injuring 26-year-old Gaige Grosskreutz—at a protest in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

He said the three shootings, carried out with a semi-automatic AR-15-style firearm, were in self-defense. The Black Lives Matter (BLM) protest where the shootings took place was held after Jacob Blake, a Black man, was left paralyzed from the waist down after he was shot by a white police officer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 months ago

Just like the Heard vs Depp case, people have already decided on the truth and they don't care that the evidence at trial painted a very different story than the one liberal media told you to believe.

Like you said, Kyle was a dumb kid who was in the wrong place at the wrong time, and he was retreating every single time he shot someone. I hate this case because I'm left in the awkward position of defending a rightoid but that trial was very thorough and those are the facts.

[-] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 17 points 8 months ago

So if I enter your house with a gun and you "threaten" me, I have the right to shot you "in self defense", right?

You don't grab a rifle, drive to another state, go to a rally that you gate and then day "they were threatening me". That's the equivalent of Russians saying now "Ukrainians are threatening us".

[-] Samueru@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You don’t grab a rifle, drive to another state

This did not happen, the rifle was always there and rittenhouse was there the day before as they worked there, at least read the damn wikipedia article of the kenosha unrest before making up such blatant lies.

edit: And to give you an example, lets say you rob a house and then flee, you can actually defend yourself if the home owner starts chasing you after you left the home.

Here they couldn't even demonstrate a "crime" or something that rittenhouse did that would have given them a reason to chase him, all we know is that Rosenbaum was going around threatening people before he began to chase rittenhouse and tried to take their weapon, also the moment right before someone shot their pistol into the air which was what made rittenhouse turn around when Rosenbaum was chasing him.

[-] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago

Kyle works in that state and did not "bring the rifle across state borders" which just cements to me that so many of you did not follow the trial. You're speaking from a position of ignorance.

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 8 months ago

Just about everything you wrote shows a complete lack of understanding of the evidence presented at trial.

Gun never crossed state lines. If it had, they could have busted him for a firearms possession charge in IL. The gun was kept in WI because of differences in gun laws between WI and IL.

Driving to another state is such a nothing. It's phrased this way to make it sound like he took some massive journey, but Kenosha and Antioch are just on opposite sides of the state line from each other. The distance is about 20 miles, about half an hour by car. He worked in Kenosha as well.

He didn't just show up and declare people were threatening him and then start shooting at them. He got into an argument with Rosenbaum when Rittenhouse tried to put out a fire and Rittenhouse tried to flee him. Someone else fired a shot, at which point Rittenhouse stopped and turned and Rosenbaum was within arms length and reached for Rittenhouse's gun. Rittenhouse fires.

Then Rittenhouse starts heading for the police line. He gets knocked to the ground, and Gruber moved to start beating him with an improvised weapon. Rittenhouse shoots him too.

Then Grosskreutz approaches him in a false surrender,.gets close, lowers his hands and points his gun at Rittenhouse before Rittenhouse shoots him. Grosskreutz's own testimony said as much.

[-] Wiz@midwest.social 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Maybe - and I'm just spitballing here - a parent should have done something different about their stupid underage failure of a son.

Things you should not do if you are the parent of a dumb kid.

  1. Give them a gun.
  2. Let them take a gun or any weapon out of the house unsupervised.
  3. Let them go to another state at night unsupervised.
  4. Let them go to a violent protest alone.
[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 8 months ago
Let them take a gun or any weapon out of the house unsupervised.

He didn't take it out of his home. The gun was never in his home. This was covered in the trial, because if he had had the gun at home, it would have been illegal due to differences in firearms possession laws between WI and IL. That's why the gun was kept in WI.

Let them go to another state at night unsupervised.

This is such a nothing, but it makes it sound like a big deal. Kenosha is right by the state line, he lived in a town just on the other side of the state line. So, what you are saying is you think parents shouldn't allow kids in their late teens to go to the next town over unsupervised. The distance is ~20 miles, about half an hour in a car.

[-] Wiz@midwest.social 3 points 8 months ago

So, what you are saying is you think parents shouldn't allow kids in their late teens to go to the next town over unsupervised. The distance is ~20 miles, about half an hour in a car.

Regular kids? That's fine.

Dumb kids like this joker? Hell no.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 months ago

who was in the wrong place at the wrong time

Why was he at that place at that time? He didn't just stumble into the area unaware.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

What liberal media is this?

this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
936 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19118 readers
2548 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS