1035
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

“There's this wild disconnect between what people are experiencing and what economists are experiencing,” says Nikki Cimino, a recruiter in Denver.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ashok36@lemmy.world 132 points 9 months ago

I had dinner with my mom last night. She told me she made $2.20/hr as a waitress in 1972. Not including tips.

That's the equivalent of over $16/hr now.

The boomers have no idea how lucky they were. And they fucking wasted it.

[-] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 94 points 9 months ago

They weren't lucky. They voted for people that removed all the guardrails that enabled their success.

[-] ashok36@lemmy.world 45 points 9 months ago

I agree. I still think they were lucky insofar as they were born in the right place at the right time to benefit massively over future generations.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 9 months ago

This is the important detail. Europe was destroyed and the USA was able to flourish. Opportunities existed that will likely never exist again. Capitalism has never been as great as it was in the USA post-WWII.

[-] lath@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Ah, but the USA post-WWIII will be even better! Or at least growth capitalism suggests it will.

[-] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago

America was basically the only industrialized country that hadn't been bombed to fuck. You had to be a clown to not succeed in that environment (or systemically oppressed, since opportunity in the US is always only for white people). Boomers took quality jobs making reliable products and moved those to low wage jobs making disposable products in China.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Boomers Now: "hey if we blow up half the world again maybe it will help the economy, also I'm way too old to be drafted"

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago

They had too. They couldn't get rich if they had to pay workers what they were paid when they were starting out.

[-] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 6 points 9 months ago

Not mutually exclusive.

[-] tacosplease@lemmy.world 50 points 9 months ago

Waiters today make $2.13 an hour in my state.

[-] Dra@lemmy.zip 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Few people in that period had the information you have now. People were presented with this economic miracle in the 50s and there was little to no components other than conformity.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

As more time has passed and I continually re-assess my Boomer parents, I am struck more and more that they truly were a propagandized generation who was never given the tools to properly think through what they were seeing. It was always just "here, more, buy this, this technology is new and amazing". Everything was new year after year until the late 80s/early 90s, when technology evened out. Even then people had cell phones and such. Once met with the Internet, especially through Facebook, we could see all of their problems flourish.

Not to say that any generation is better than any other or not, but I do believe that each generation after Boomers is actually much better than the previous one at critical thinking--probably because society had no choice but to and the fact that more people have at least a bachelors degree now.

[-] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago

Bachelor's degrees and unleaded fuel make a hell of a difference.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

As much as you complain about the boomers, the current generation(s) are the ones you need to pay attention when it comes to who’s caused the house shortage because of unchecked capitalism. There’s more than enough houses that should house everyone for cheap.

You cannot blame boomers for the smouldering wreck that Airbnb left behind. That was the work of a millennial. Take some responsibility for yourselves and your own actions that have attributed to the current state of society that you live in.

[-] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 9 months ago

My guy, air bnb didn't cause the shortage or even significantly make it worse. It's the mega corps that literally own hundreds of thousands of homes across the US and just rent them out. I'm not even upset at boomers who own 3 or 4 rental properties and I work with a lot of them. It's always mega corps fucking it up for the rest of us.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Megacorps aren’t in general ‘boomers’

mega corps span all the recent generations.

And fuck off with this ‘my guy’ bullshit you sexist, condescending git.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago

Housing was wildly expensive and rising incredibly fast before Airbnb was invented (company started in 2008, which you might recognize as an important year for the real estate market). After 2008, tons of investors came in to buy up the depressed value properties to either flip or rent out or just hold onto until the value returned. People buying houses with cash isn't something Airbnb caused. Corporations buying up houses to rent isn't something Airbnb caused. Foreign investors buying up houses to get their money out of their country isn't something Airbnb caused.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Airbnb invented a way to make money off of housing by taking houses away from people. Entire blocks will be bought by a company just to use as an Airbnb hence why a lot of stipulations have been recently coming in to prevent a ‘housing shortage’ while there’s enough housing.

So yes, Airbnb did a lot of damage there when it comes to ‘who can we pin ideas on’ blame which we love to do so much to boomers.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

LOL you really believe that "a millenial" created AirBNB and not some conglomerate of venture capitalists funneling billions at a team made up of people of all ages?

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No shit. So you agree It’s not just boomers. Now go get mad at the OP for spawning this stupid nonsense argument in the first place. Go on and grow that attention span.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Seems you think that I am responsible for your anger. Weird.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Seems you think everyone is responsible for you aside from you

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago
[-] current@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Wtf even does "the current generations" mean? Whenever people say "the newer generation" or "the young generation" or something they just sound so fucking incompetent.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

And worse: the home buying age isn't 19, it's more like 30 - 40.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Being over 40 doesn’t make you a boomer.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

As is blaming boomers when the world is not run by just that one generation. The most successful billionaires today are made up from genx and millennials.

So making it a generation war just when it’s pointed at boomers is just stupid and incompetent for an argument.

[-] mellowheat@suppo.fi 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Median waiter salary in USA seems to be $15/hr currently. Did you think it was significantly less? There are large differences in the median between states. Where did she work?

[-] saintshenanigans@programming.dev 23 points 9 months ago

Reminder that 15/hr was the goal about ten years ago and inflation spiked hard between 2020-2023. 15/hr is no longer a "generous" wage.

[-] ashok36@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

$15/hr with tips included, maybe. That's why I specified that the $16/hr equivalent from 1972 did not include tips.

[-] nrezcm@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Couple of my friends were servers at their family's resturaunt growing up (early 2000s) and I think they only made about 2 and some change before tips. 30 year difference from your example and their wages were roughly the same amount. It's ridiculous.

[-] mellowheat@suppo.fi 1 points 9 months ago

I don't think tips are included in official salary figures? Are they?

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

Not even close. Server wage is like $3 in some states. Stop lyin

[-] mellowheat@suppo.fi 1 points 9 months ago

You may need to look up the meaning of the word "median".

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

Servers in most of America make $2.13 an hour plus tips. Id say depending on COL, anywhere from $12/hr at shitholes to $30+/hr at nice spots or high COL

$15/hr seems like a decent number, considering most servers will not claim cash tips. considering lack of cash these days compared to credit usage, id say $20-25/hr is a decent average.

But again, the other commenter said that $2.20 was WITHOUT tips, so certainly the 1972 waittress made more still

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 8 points 9 months ago
[-] mellowheat@suppo.fi 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah, I agree. There are no clear figures on this.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Livable wage is now more like $30.

[-] mellowheat@suppo.fi 1 points 9 months ago

Sure. But was ~$3/hr a livable wage in 1976?

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Definitely was. Inflation has been ridiculous over the years. My father pumped gas part time at Sears and was able to have an apartment with roommates as well as pay all of his tuition for college.

this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2024
1035 points (100.0% liked)

News

23708 readers
3324 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS