404
I can't use AMD (midwest.social)

It's necessary for my very important hobby of generating anime nudes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lorty@lemmy.ml 18 points 6 months ago

Brother of "I need nVidia for raytracing" while only playing last decade games.

[-] dinckelman@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

I completely unironically know people who bought a 4090 exclusively to play League

[-] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 7 points 6 months ago

Not gonna lie, raytracing is cooler on older games than it is newer ones. Newer games use a lot of smoke and mirrors to simulate raytracing, which means raytracing isn't as obvious of an upgrade, or can even be a downgrade depending on the scene. Older games, however, don't have as much smoke and mirrors so raytracing can offer more of an improvement.

Also, stylized games with raytracing are 10/10. Idk why, but applying rtx to highly stylized games always looks way cooler than on games with realistic graphics.

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Quake 2 does looks pretty rad in RTX mode

[-] nexussapphire@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

Playing old games with Ray tracing is just as amazing as playing new games with Ray tracing. I know quake rt gets too dark to play half way through, they should have added light sources in those areas.

Then again, I played through cyberpunk 2077 at 27fps before the 2.0 update. Control was pretty good at 50fps, and I couldn't recommend portal enough at about 40fps on my 2070 super. I don't know if teardown leveraged rt cores but digital foundry said it ran better on Nvidia and I played through that game at 70fps.

I love playing with new technologies. I wish graphics card prices stayed down because rt is too heavy nowadays for my first gen RT card. I play newer games with rt off and most setting turned down because of it.

[-] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I love playing with new technologies. I wish graphics card prices stayed down because rt is too heavy nowadays for my first gen RT card. I play newer games with rt off and most setting turned down because of it.

I wish they stayed down because VR has the potential to bring back crossfire/SLI. Nvidia's gameworks already has support for using two GPUs to render different eyes and supposedly, when properly implemented, it results in a nearly 2x increase in fps. However, GPUs are way too expensive right now for people to buy two of them, so afaik there aren't any VR games that support splitting rendering between two GPUs.

VR games could be a hell of a lot cooler if having 2 GPUs was widely affordable and developers developed for them, but instead it's being held back by single-gpu performance.

[-] nexussapphire@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

Wasn't there an issue with memory transfer latency across the connector? I thought they killed it because the latency was too high for higher frame rates causing a consistent stuttering.

They tried to reuse that enterprise connector with higher throughput but last I heard they never fully developed support for it because of a lack of interest from devs.

this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
404 points (100.0% liked)

linuxmemes

20744 readers
237 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS