112

We really shouldn't take this Meta thing lightly.

They could offer the slickest interface and keep people locked to their friends. That interface can use protocols that make it difficult/impossible for non-Threads instances to play ball (ooh this cool new feature is only available through the Threads app; Oh, mybasement.world.ml.xyz can't read that content). There are many ways to Embrace, Extend, and Extinguish, we've seen Meta do it before (e.g. XMPP), and I'm sure we haven't even thought of some ways Threads could EEE.

I think defederation from Meta's instances is probably our only option to protect what we have.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] amiuhle@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago

I think there should be an alliance of instances that defederate from any instance that federates with Meta.

[-] tomasz@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago
[-] amiuhle@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They pledge to defederate from Meta, I'd go one step further and defederate from any instance that federates with Meta.

[-] supergrobi@mastodon.berlin 1 points 1 year ago
[-] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

The guy was paid by meta

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

The Defederated Federation 🤭

[-] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

think of it like when united federation of planets didn't include romulans ;)

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago

That just gives meta more reasons to make extensions to activitypub, or a fork, without consulting others first as nobody's even working with them...

If they're federating then at least they have some interest in keeping things compatible

this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
112 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

17688 readers
9 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS