160
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
160 points (100.0% liked)
Games
16737 readers
380 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I have better things to do fortunately. It's pretty clear from other posts that you already made up your mind. So there's no use. We can end the conversation here.
Also I'm not trying to convince anyone. I just wanted to help you.
Pro tip: dO yOuR rEsEaRcH!!1! Has never convinced or helped anyone.
I am willing to have my mind changed if someone were to actually show me any evidence of SBI being bad for some reason. The Steam group says nothing other than "SBI worked on these games," implying they are bad but not even making the step to say why. When I try to ask people why I should care if SBI is involved I get:
Showing me one of these "terrible" tweets by SBI would sure shut me up if it was anywhere near as terrible as claimed.
I swear people don't understand the burden of proof and you're one of them
Can you reference how exactly I hold the burden? Did I state anything that I have to back up? I only said their twitter is locked. I never said anything else. Looks like the room iq is quite low here.
For the people downvoting. I'm not op. I never claimed anything.
Can you reference how exactly they said you hold the burden? The only said you don't understand burden of proof, (due to your statements implying that the person making bold claims doesn't need to provide any evidence of those claims.) They never said anything else.
I swear people don't understand the burden of proof and you're one of them
Lmao. I'm losing braincells here lol. Where did I say or imply "the person making bold claims doesn't need to provide any evidence of those claims".
My only intention was to help you find those tweets if you were interested. Some of you behave so chronically online. Get a life.
Right here:
OP made them vaguest of all claims ("SBI leadership said awful things") and I simply asked them for specifics and a link. You know, to "provide any evidence for those claims."
Your reply to me was basically "look it up yourself", which is not how the burden of proof works.
It's always projection...
How did I imply it? Can you also reference where I refer to OP. I replied cause op's comment was posted 2 days ago and it was clear they weren't going to reply.
This is just a misunderstanding in my opinion. So let me make it clear that I'm not on op's side. I don't care if sweet abby inc is in a game I play. I do care about Kotaku tho. I have a hard time believing their stories.
I only called you chronically online because you have at least 50 comments on this topic in 2 days.
So I'll end the conversation here. Idk why it was even dragged on this long.
I only called you chronically online because you're laughing like a lunatic every other sentence, and apparently going into my profile and counting each individual comment I've made on a given topic. That's not the behaviour of someone who touches grass.
That's not what chronically online means. It's the internet , people say "LMAO" a lot. Scrolling a profile for 5 sec thread is not that hard and 50 is a guess. You seem quite troubled using the internet. You don't need to take everything here to face value. I get the feeling that you don't know when to stop so I'm just gonna block you for now.
Says the person who's being going at this just as long and needs to announce his leaving, twice, instead of just leaving.