136
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Tonight, I want to announce that I will be returning to the arena of politics and challenging Nick [LaLota] for the battle over #NY1,” Santos told Semafor in a statement. “I look forward to debating him on the issues and on his weak record as a Republican. The fight for our majority is imperative for the survival of the country.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] whodatdair 49 points 8 months ago

This timeline is so dark I feel like it owes us this - please let him get elected and booted a second time

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 31 points 8 months ago

No, fuck that. Elected? No. That would affect a lot of people.

I want the debate to be the other guy just enumerating all his crimes, over and over, on repeat.

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 21 points 8 months ago

It feels like a mooch ago we had a man hiding in bushes, we’ve been so over saturated with meme quality politics that I feel we just don’t get the same level of value from it.

But I would still get a chuckle out of Santos being fired and arrested again.

[-] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 7 points 8 months ago

How long is a mooch again, was it 12 days or some such?

[-] mriormro@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

This isn't a fucking tv show. This has very real consequences for people.

[-] HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social 11 points 8 months ago

This timeline is so dark Anish Kapoor tried to purchase exclusive rights to it.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

It'd be hard to boot him a second time. Everyone knows he's a liar and fraud so the voters can't really claim ignorance this time around. If GOP voters go for them it's just because Trump has trained them to love fraudsters.

this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
136 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19118 readers
2627 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS