256
submitted 2 years ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Stamau123@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Mein kampf is a terribly written book. Maybe it's a translation issue? Does it read better in German?

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago

I read it in English so I can’t say. I just chalked it up to Hitler being a dipshit

[-] Fudoshin@feddit.uk 23 points 2 years ago

I've heard Germans say it's terrible in German too.

It is very bad. It is absolutely not a book that is so dangerous that just reading it will turn you into a Nazi. The content is of course atrocious, but the writing is so, so bad that you won't even notice the content because you just can't read the crap. Actually, I would be very wary of anyone who claims to have read the whole thing outside of uni, because there is something very wrong with them.

[-] GenEcon@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I am confused... its a banned book in germany.

[-] nadwwwimni 13 points 2 years ago

TLDR: "Mein Kampf" was never actually banned in Germany but its complicated.

I am from Germany and the fate of the book after WWII is pretty wierd, this is just written from memory and its way more complicated as history always is.

First you need to understand in nazi germany nearly everyone had a copy of "Mein Kampf" , it was given out like candy and not accepting/buying it would be pretty suspicious to the secret police. (had lots of talk about it with my 90 year old grandma, you needed to fly the swastika at every occasion and be able to produce shit like the flag and the book in case you were ever under suspicion or else... ) After the War most people got rid of the stuff or put it in the back of the attic because of ongoing denazification and to forget ( my guess is because the book is an afront to literary sensibilities).

Hitler seems to have bequeathed everything he owned to the German State, including the Copyright of "Mein Kampf". That meant the exclusive publishing rights went to the Bavarian State, because he had his official residence in Munich. Now the Bavarian Government decided to just dont print the book and nobody could legally produce and sell new copies. This worked pretty much as a defacto ban because for obvious reasons, including it's just unbelievably bad not only in content but in language as well, only (neo-) nazis or historians (who could just get it in Archives/University libraries or from that one wierd grandpa who likes showing of his medals and rants about the jews) would even want that book in post war Germany. Basically everyone was fine with the status quo and it went ignored.

Fast forward to ~2010 and Historians realise a Dilemma. They decided to start producing "Mein Kampf" as a heavily annotated "critical edition" because the German Copyright will run out at the end of 2015, and the defacto ban would be lifted. At the time that was quite controversial, discussions about banning it completely or even making it a mandatory read in history lessons, so teachers could put it in context, were ongoing.

Right after the copyright ran out the book was published, again to much controversy. I am pretty sure it actually sold well, atleast at first. Today its a nonissue again and there are still people in Germany who think its illegal to own a copy because why would you even want to read that shit, its worse than Atlas Shrugged.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

its worse than Atlas Shrugged

Lmao

[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Looking it up, it was never banned, it was just prevented from being reprinted due to the government holding the copyright and not making it available. It's now in public domain.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/arts/hitlers-mein-kampf-to-go-on-sale-in-germany

The German state of Bavaria has held the copyright for Adolf Hitler’s autobiography since 1945 and has withheld publishing the book, preventing any reprints in Germany. But in 2016, the book becomes available in the public domain, which will make it widely available in Germany for the first time since World War II.

That means it was perfectly legal to have it, it just couldn't be printed in Germany.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 years ago

There are Germans outside of Germany and there are also ways to access information anyway. Also, I have no knowledge of this but I'm sure there are legal ways to access it as well, for studying History or Hitler's life or whatever else. Rarely are bans total for anything. There's almost always exceptions.

[-] tryptaminev@feddit.de 6 points 2 years ago

No it is amazing. It is so amazing to read, that a Turkish origined comedian took it up on him to read it to Germans, to show them just how great it was.

Resulting in even some hardcore Nazis to end up laughing, because the book is just completely utter horseshit.

this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
256 points (100.0% liked)

News

36043 readers
2704 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS