1677
submitted 2 years ago by nulluser@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

The world has experienced its hottest day on record, according to meteorologists.

The average global temperature reached 17.01C (62.62F) on Monday, according to the US National Centres for Environmental Prediction.

The figure surpasses the previous record of 16.92C (62.46F) - set back in August 2016.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 105 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Every person living in a democracy can make a difference with their VOTE. Only vote for people who have plans and intentions of bringing change. Vote at all levels, and vote whenever you get an opportunity. Ask what candidates in municipal elections think about the climate emergency. Organize. Talk to doubters. We can do this.

[-] gthutbwdy@lemmy.sdf.org 98 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If voting worked, we would have solved this issue decades ago. You can vote for whomever you want, but at the end, no matter what they promise, they always end up doing nothing at all, because they are elected by using big oil donations.

Only a self-organized revolution can stop this madness, people in some nations are already blocking oil tankers and oil rigs. We can't win by only voting, you can vote for a day every few years, but we need to fight this everyday. Take turns blocking streets so no oil driven trucks and cars pass, only this will make an effect.

The idea that nonviolent protest works has been the most harmful idea in history

[-] ericbomb@lemmy.world 62 points 2 years ago

I mean nonviolent protests DO work.

Non-disruptive DOES NOT work though.

MLK Jr didn't peacefully sit in a park. They ran boycotts, sit ins, shut down streets, trespassed into white only areas, and drove businesses insane.

If MLK Jr was your enemy you were going to have a miserable time when he rolled into town.

Ghandi had people illegally burn documents and basically smuggled salt against all regulations.

[-] TassieTosser@aussie.zone 31 points 2 years ago

MLK had the Black Panthers and Nation of Islam as looming threats. Gandhi is also the one who said "pacifism without violence is not pacifism, it is helplessness." A violent counterpart to a non-violent movement helps by being the stick to the non-violent carrot.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

See US Constitution, Amendment 2 for another example of backing peace with capability of violence to earn respect.

[-] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

I can assure you the US Government is not quaking in their boots at the thought of Billy Bob's basement arsenal.

[-] JudgeHolden@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Especially since those guys are pretty much all lard-asses. There's a reason why every competent military on the planet emphasizes physical fitness before anything else; it's because real combat --as opposed to playing paintball with your fatbody friends-- is one of the most physically and psychologically punishing activities known to man.

[-] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Indeed. As 101st infantry alumni, I'm well aware. Having been on both sides, military combat arms and a civilian gun owner, I find the 'defense against the government' idea around the 2nd amendment to be laughable. If they thought you were an actual threat they'd drone strike you out of existence, and you'd be a bullet point on an after action report. They own us now and they know it, that's why everything is going to shit, and it's why we were warned about the rise of the IMC. If only my younger self had been educated about that, I may not have joined up. Hmmm maybe there's a link there?!?! I wonder.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

But it’s not about defending against the government. It’s about deterring the government. A pufferfish can’t defend against a shark, but by being spiky it deters the shark from attacking it.

Surely they teach this distinction in military training?

[-] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

No they pretty much just taught us how to kill shit. In all seriousness, do you honestly believe that's the case? That the US federal government is deterred by an armed public? Because I don't think they give a shit, at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

That’s funny I thought catching a bullet was one of the most physically punishing activities known to man.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ericbomb@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

That's fair, but either way we gotta give up on this nondisruptive nonsense.

Gathering on the park outside of the white house at a time they agreed to doesn't do anything and why it's encouraged.

[-] ckrius@lemmy.fmhy.ml 7 points 2 years ago

Yup, the only real revolution is a violent revolution.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 years ago

Violence is a sometimes (even often) unavoidable byproduct of revolution, not an essential characteristic. Don't confuse the two.

[-] ckrius@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

George Jackson would disagree.

[-] RobertOwnageJunior@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

And Michael Jackson would disagree-hee-hee.

[-] Zoot@reddthat.com 11 points 2 years ago

You know, now that a good portion of people are on Lemmy, it just might be the perfect place to start organizing, whatever you feel that may be...

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago
[-] ShakyPerception@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Okay, when a government has completely collapsed, after the total collapse of the larger global leading entity; a peaceful revolution that results in something completely new, should be the top option.

But I don’t think we have that much time

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mordred@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 40 points 2 years ago

Both. We need both. Voting matters. Grassroots organization matters. Now is absolutely not the time to give up on democracy. It is also absolutely not the time to give up on mass organizing at the grassroots. Both, we need both.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] spread@programming.dev 44 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Honestly voting now is to little too late. The Overton window isn't anywhere near the point of allowing actually meaningful change and the 4-5 year cycle of voting is too slow. If we really want to solve anything, the change should be systemic. Still, voting is important.

[-] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago

Of course voting alone won't do it. We need a lot more. Holding billionaires to account will go a long way as well.

[-] zombuey@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago

I think its a statistical loss if we rely on denocracy. The stupid far outnumber the rational.

[-] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 years ago

Relying on democracy without participating in democracy is the only way to fail democracy.

[-] fubbernuckin@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

You may be underestimating how many stupid people there are.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

You may be overestimating the degree to which judging people who disagree with you as stupid grants you license to disenfranchise them.

[-] TheDubz87@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

And the greedy outnumber us both. As long as these companies are lining politicians pockets, they will only act like they're trying.

[-] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

The "momentarily-embarrassed millionaires" don't help, either.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

I think you guys are onto something here! Democracy is not going to work because everyone outside your circle is either evil or stupid. And given you’re saving all of humanity from the thermoapocapypse, it is your mission to destroy democracy and seize control of power! (for the greater good of course not because you’re stupid and evil, because everyone else is stupid and evil and you’re doing it for their own good).

[-] SlowNoPoPo@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago

Sadly no, show me a political party that the us, china or India could realistically vote for that would substantially reduce emissions in the next 10 years

[-] nomadic@lemmy.one 9 points 2 years ago

Absolute rubbish. People believing that their vote will bring change ensures climate disaster. The system is rigged and if you agree to participate in the system you are part of the problem. Thinking voting can have any meaningful impact highlights that you are unaware of how serious the situation is.

[-] Tsoi_Zhiv@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Just want to join your downvotes by backing you up and saying you are right. Belief in the system and that voting is the answer is downright absurd at this point.

[-] obinice@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Unfortunately, voting doesn't help. Besides there being basically no parties with any real strong climate policies, when you vote a decent sounding one in, they just go back on their promises anyway.

And even IF we vote in a party that truly brings about radical and positive climate change policies, that's just our one country, a drop in the ocean. The rest of the planet would still drag us down with them, even in that wildly positive scenario.

I don't mean to be a doomsayer, I just don't see a way out, I wish I did. Voting certainly doesn't solve our problems, climate change or otherwise. The rich ruling class will do whatever they want, regardless.

[-] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago

You're incorrect. Giving up isn't an option.

[-] tlf@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago

Individual action also works. Its pretty easy to get information about what you can do and show those less inclined that it's not hell to live on the other side. The IPCC has that part as well if anyone is looking for the impact their changes can have: https://news.sky.com/story/climate-change-what-does-the-ipcc-mean-by-choice-architecture-and-can-it-change-our-behaviour-12582739

[-] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

Great link. Thank you!

this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
1677 points (100.0% liked)

World News

48732 readers
1933 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS