641
submitted 11 months ago by Linkerbaan@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

The Israeli government has failed to comply with at least one measure in the legally binding order from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in South Africa’s genocide case, Human Rights Watch said today. Citing warnings about “catastrophic conditions” in Gaza, the court ordered Israel on January 26, 2024, to “take immediate and effective measures to enable the provision of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian aid,” and to report back on its compliance to the specific measures “within one month.”

One month later, however, Israel continues to obstruct the provision of basic services and the entry and distribution within Gaza of fuel and lifesaving aid, acts of collective punishment that amount to war crimes and include the use of starvation of civilians as a weapon of war. Fewer trucks have entered Gaza and fewer aid missions have been permitted to reach northern Gaza in the several weeks since the ruling than in the weeks preceding it, according to United Nations Office of the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).

“The Israeli government is starving Gaza’s 2.3 million Palestinians, putting them in even more peril than before the World Court’s binding order,” said Omar Shakir, Israel and Palestine director at Human Rights Watch. “The Israeli government has simply ignored the court’s ruling, and in some ways even intensified its repression, including further blocking lifesaving aid.”

Human Rights Watch found in December 2023 that Israeli authorities are using starvation as a weapon of war. Pursuant a policy set out by Israeli officials and carried out by Israeli forces, the Israeli authorities are deliberately blocking the delivery of water, food, and fuel, willfully impeding humanitarian assistance, apparently razing agricultural areas, and depriving the civilian population of objects indispensable to its survival.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Visstix@lemmy.world 46 points 11 months ago

Trump would be worse yes. Cause the Palestine situation would most likely get worse. And a lot of other things as well, like Ukraine. I'm not sure what's so difficult about it.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

One is our present reality, the other is a hypothetical future. That’s what makes it so difficult.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago

The purpose of voting is to improve the future.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago
[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

We do, if "we" are European.

By contrast, most Europeans tend to vote the opposite way from Americans, taking a “prospective” perspective.

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

It's not as difficult as your presentation makes it sound. This should be a lay-up for the Grand Old Party. I could accept a moderately conservative truly moral alternative to cosigning Israel's strategic suicide. Instead the party heads are too scared of the base (must not have any guns) to put their true enemy in prison where he belongs.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

If this election isn’t difficult for you, maybe meditate on why that is. 30,000 dead. 10,000 children. If Trump had done this, people would be apoplectic. Instead, we get rationalizations on why Biden is necessary. This is not an easy choice for me. And I’m not ashamed to admit it.

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

You think Trump would stand up to Israel?

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

No. Do you think Biden would stand up to Israel?

[-] GojuRyu@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

So if neither would stand up to Israel, what makes Trump preferable to Biden?

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Vote for Pedro.

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

False dichotomy. People are apoplectic and that's why the rationalizations are happening. I'm not ashamed to admit it.

[-] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

He means it would be covered entirely differently in the media and you know he ain't wrong, that's probably why you're deflecting instead of responding honestly.

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

lol, I've said plenty about the issue. I'm an open book, I don't delete comments like some of the children on this board. By all means.

[-] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

...You're doing it right now.

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Sorry, it's been a full work day and I spent all day out skating yesterday. I am very tired and can't figure out what you want anymore. The ball is in your court now, up to you if you want to see where I really stand on this issue or if you're gonna keep harassing me about it. I'm not gonna perform for you just because that other tankie prick thinks he can insult me and expect me to go along with it.

[-] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Oh look. It has trouble with direct statements of clear meaning. Bullshit artists always hate those, nothing much to work with,

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago
[-] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

You're doing it again.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

I’m not sure I follow your dialectic, or if I even want to.

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

It's not mine in the first place, you're trying to tell me that I should have this extra manufactured tension weighing down on me about the general election and I'm telling you how you have it backwards and why.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

I wouldn’t call 30,000 deaths, 10,000 of them children, “extra manufactured tension.” If caring about that is backwards, I don’t ever want to be straight.

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Politics requires sophisticated decision making. Do you think that body count would have been higher with Trump in office instead of Biden, lower, or the same? Don't feel obligated to respond, just understand why your argument doesn't seem to be working. You can read more of my comments if you want more of my perspective and positions or not. Your reply is perfectly rational but so is mine.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Fucking hypotheticals. People are dying now. Today! Fuck the election and your liberal comforts. Genocide Deniers aren’t rational.

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I have never denied it, but thanks for showing me your true colors. You should check out mine some day.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

No thanks. Your apathy says enough.

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Bitch I even invited you to read what I've written on the subject you might even learn something from it.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

“Extra manufactured tension?” 🤦

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Keep going, or don't. Have a nice day.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 11 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Genocide Deniers

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] Tattorack@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I hear Biden getting shit over Israel all the time! The hell do you mean?

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I have a difficult time responding to discordant logic. My mind doesn’t work that way.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

I could accept a moderately conservative truly moral alternative

Too bad no such thing has existed in American presidential elections since the 70s at the latest.

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

The 80s had national morality prescribed by televangelists.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Yup, all of which are of course thoroughly immoral hypocrites. The "trickle down" fiscal policies and the ramping up of the oppressive "war on drugs" were immoral as hell too.

this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
641 points (100.0% liked)

World News

40340 readers
3643 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS