106
US, UK bomb Houthi sites in Yemen amid surge in Red Sea ship attacks
(www.aljazeera.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
106 points (100.0% liked)
World News
37121 readers
581 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Attacking civilian ships is generally considered a dick move.
It's a gigachad move and the only morally correct thing to do when they're supplying a genocide.
But they're not just attacking ships supplying aid to Israel. They are attacking whatever passes by them. If it was to support Gaza, why would they have attacked a clearly marked Chinese ship?
Pretty sure they stopped attacking Chinese and Russian ships since they stopped supplying "israel" and co. through the Red Sea after the Yemeni gov told them to. There were a few misfires after that but for the most part they're left alone.
Hell, a br*tish ship misqueraded as a Chinese ship a few days ago to avoid being attacked. Probably why Yemen is ending up hitting a few Chinese ships too.
Regardless, China has condemned the US and UK's bombing of Yemen. As anyone with a hint of morals should.
Curious how you logic justifies their attacks on western ships, but not the west's response to these attacks.
Yeah western countries and their ships should probably consider not supplying or supporting the genocide.
And if you don't want to be retaliated against, don't attack ships.
This idiot would've told Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising to not attack the nazis if they don't want to be retaliated against.
And that is the move betacuck response you could have given.
I'd say supporting a genocidal colony with billions of dollars instead of your own country's healthcare and education is about the most "betacuck" thing you can do lmao
Also, what are you, a child?
Any rebuttal to the comment or just ad hominem bullshit?
Genocide is fine, tho. ๐
Because two wrongs always make a right. You projecting prick.
Bengalis, Cubans, Vietnamese, etc shouldn't have fought against their oppressors and liberated their nations then? Cuz killing people is wrong and two wrongs don't make a right ig?
Holy hell. What a massive assumption.
I've never seen someone try and treat the world as so black and white. Yikes.
Do you have an actual response or just the black and white take that "two wrongs don't make a right"?
You seem to be conflating me condemning Houthi attacks on unarmed vessels as supporting Israel.
It is clear you only think in black and white. Especially if you're calling Houthi gigachads, you might want to look into who you're supporting.
I'm supporting those trying to stop an active genocide. Unlike you apparently.
By supporting a group that also calling for a genocide?
And again your back to the black and white thinking, but what can I expect from someone unironically using the term gigachad.
This is no different from sanctions if you bother to think about it. Sure it's more scary, but they aren't killing people. That should count for something. They're just limited by their material conditions and doing whatever they can to stop the genocide.
Why did they attack those ships?