957
submitted 8 months ago by sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Why is the two-state solution inherently sympathetic to the settler colonial state ?

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago

The settlers never should have been there in the first place. It isn't their land and never was. They arrived touting violence and have not ceased. A two state solution validates their self professed "right to the land" and allows for eventual further expansion of the settler colonial state some time in the future should we not keep constant surveillance and management on the proposed Israeli state.

In addition, a single state solution does not necessarily require the forceful expulsion of every settler. It is not inherently violent or oppressive either. In apartheid South Africa many settlers left of their own volition once their privileged status had dissolved.

this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
957 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32290 readers
463 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS