957
submitted 8 months ago by sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 3 points 8 months ago

That argument goes both ways. "Nader would have won if progressives hadn't handed the election to the Republicans by throwing their votes away on Gore." Same is true for 2016 with Bernie and Clinton.

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago

It really doesn’t go both ways. The winning presidential candidate needs to get the most votes, and most US voters are not progressive. They’re moderate, or indifferent.

I don’t know how you could say that about HRC and Sanders. That’s not even a hypothetical: they literally had a head to head match where, to my huge disappointment, HRC won. Protesting HRC helped elect Trump, and obviously that hasn’t been good for progressive interests or democracy.

this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
957 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32290 readers
463 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS