434
submitted 9 months ago by corbin@infosec.pub to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] red_pigeon@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

Won't they start pulling more and more tax for it then ? Having it private keeps the competition at least, wouldn't you agree ?

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 61 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Your taxes already subsidize it. You just don't see any benefits for your money in the current system because they pocket it without making upgrades.

[-] eating3645@lemmy.world 46 points 9 months ago

ISPs in the US are notorious for getting public funds for services that they never provide, so I wouldn't be too concerned about that.

[-] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 19 points 9 months ago

Exactly. They're getting massive handouts from our money. Let's cut out the middlemen and pay a utility directly.

[-] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 30 points 9 months ago

What competition? Tax me and give me fucking municipal fiber instead of giving giant paychecks to wealthy assholes who invest nothing in improving the service but raise everyone's rates regardless.

[-] marx2k@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

Ah yes competition. I get to choose between two providers, charter and at&t. Same price, about the same speeds.

[-] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Not where I live. All private Internet, but very limited choices that all keep getting more and more expensive.

[-] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

They also tend to deliberately stay out of each other's service areas so they can ramp up prices with de facto local monopolies.

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 9 points 9 months ago

I guess to answer that, wonder if your water, electric, or waste companies are gouging you. If they are, like in Texas, then yeah maybe?

Everywhere I lived, people and voting have strong control over utilities and they are fairly priced because it's a service not a business

[-] rusticus@lemm.ee 9 points 9 months ago

Please tell us how “keeping it private” ensures competition and prevents monopolies. For extra credit, let us know WHO is responsible for preventing monopolies.

[-] red_pigeon@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Where did I say it prevents monopolies ?

Where I'm from if it goes public I'm sure the govt is going to take advantage of it with piss poor speeds. When it's private, at least there are companies competing with decent speeds even though it's expensive. It's a choice between the lesser of two evils.

[-] rusticus@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

Where I’m from private is slower, more expensive, capped, and throttled. Public is faster, cheaper, unlimited and unregulated. And private lobby’s/bribes politicians to put laws in place preventing public.

[-] Montagge@kbin.earth 7 points 9 months ago

Where I use to live was all private. CenturyLink was the only option as they had an agreement with Comcast that Comcast wouldn't come into my area.

I paid $60/month for 500kbps down. Yes kilobits.

this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
434 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59640 readers
2176 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS