380

submitted 10 months ago by voodooattack@lemmy.world to c/196

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] voodooattack@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yet they both committed atrocities (torture, murder, rape and god knows what else) and only one is being hailed as “explorer”.

Edit: I’m not saying we should hail Genghis Khan as an explorer, I’m saying that Christopher Columbus should be deplored as a murderer and a marauder, not praised as an explorer.

[-] TheControlled@lemmy.world 37 points 10 months ago

Being a murderer and explorer are not mutually exclusive. If ChatGPT said "Murderer" one might presume that he was simply a local killer, captured by the law, and convicted a la Ted Bundy. Explorer is a more appropriate title for Columbus, like "Dictator" is likely more appropriate than "Murderer" for Hitler. Murderer, sadly, is too commonplace for people of their evil.

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav 21 points 10 months ago

For real. Name the worst serial killer you know, and Columbus was probably worse than that. It sickens me to read about it.

[-] june@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Why do we assume ‘explorer’ has a positive moral implication?

To me, looking through all of history, exploration has largely been a net negative to humanity. Modern day exploration isn’t terribly far off. The more we explore the ocean the more we strip it of resources. The more we explore space the more we look to exploit it for wealth.

Explorers are enablers of worse people at best.