1623
dotnet developer (programming.dev)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

Maybe it's a myth, but it sure sounds plausible. The software that checks the "Windows 9" substring doesn't even have to exist for this to be reason they chose to skip to version 10 — they just had to be concerned that it might exist.

Sure, maybe there's no C function that returns the string, but there's a ver command. It would be trivial to shell out to the command. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ver_(command)

This doesn't prove anything, but there are a TON of examples of code that checks for the substring. It's not hard to imagine that code written circa 2000 would not be future proof. https://sourcegraph.com/search?q=context:global+%22%5C%22windows+9%5C%22%22&patternType=keyword&sm=0

[-] dan@upvote.au 3 points 1 year ago

but there are a TON of examples of code that checks for the substring

oh

oh no

There's code in the JDK that does that??

I really wish I didn't see that.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

Yup!! Never look under the hood in software, you'll just be disappointed ☹️

[-] dan@upvote.au 2 points 1 year ago

I've been a software developer for 20 years and this comment is too real. Some days I'm amazed that any software even works at all.

this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
1623 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

22780 readers
334 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS