769
submitted 1 year ago by Plw@lemmy.today to c/facepalm@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] EyIchFragDochNur@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

You want to imprison a 10yo for lying and not telling the truth for 6 years?

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

You want to say children who commit horrible crimes should face no punishment because they were young? Sorry but...yes. If a kid does something this horrible they need to face charges. Not charged as an adult but...yep.

[-] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

Children in these situations don't need incarceration they need therapy and rehabilitation. Putting them behind bars is just a waste at best, and doesn't in any way make the world a better place.

[-] workerONE@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I think sometimes people respond to punishment. They/we don't want the consequences of an action so we change our behavior. With that said, our prison system is terrible. A person's punishment should be loss of freedom (only). IMO we should still treat prisoners with some dignity and they should be safe and reasonably comfortable.

[-] bane_killgrind@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Nah their parent or guardian need charges, because at 10 you need to be provided the means the accomplish anything, including crime.

If you provide a monkey a flamethrower and let it loose in a building, they aren't charging the monkey with arson.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Sure we need to figure out if the parents put her up to this as well. But we don't even know thats the case here. For all we know she heard the word somewhere and thought it would be fun to claim this. People, even children, need to face up to what they have done. Just curious, in your version of the legal system you want us to start using...at what age do we ignore what a child has done and only punish the adults? 18 when they are legally an adult themselves?

Also...The monkey in your analogy would, beyond a shadow of a doubt, be killed because it was a threat. Nobody would even think twice about putting a bullet in it.

[-] jnplch@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago

If you look at the Wikipedia entry for “age of criminal responsibility,” quite a few countries think that children under a certain age just plain cannot be held responsible for a crime. Of course, in the US it’s different and there are some states where age does exempt from responsibility and some where it doesn’t.

[-] ByGourou@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For me it's a slider, the older the more responsible, at 15 I would agree with you, but 10 I definitely think the parents should be the ones in court.

Would the monkey really be put down tho ? If it still holds the flamethrower of course, because it's still a threat, but after the fact I don't think so.

[-] bane_killgrind@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Not "put her up to it"... 'allowed the behaviour"

There's the other article about a 17 year old being killed during a welfare check so getting put down doesn't seem to make a distinction.

[-] EyIchFragDochNur@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Thank you. Hell what a stupid 'revenge instead of rehabilitation" attitude some people have...

[-] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

If you provide a monkey a flamethrower and let it loose in a building, they aren’t charging the monkey with arson.

Yeah, but you don't need to convict a monkey of a crime to put it in a cage.

[-] bane_killgrind@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Right they take your monkey. They should take your kid too.

[-] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

I don't have a kid, but I appreciate your opinion.

[-] bane_killgrind@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I'm sure you wouldn't give them flamethrowers if you had any.

[-] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

Not until after I was done playing with it.

[-] EyIchFragDochNur@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I just say civilised cultures don't imprison a child for a dumb lie. Because you said

Whatever she is just lock her up.

At the very least, those are kids who need an evaluation and probably some sort of therapy to help them become reasonably well-adjusted adults. Try and correct their course early so they won't go so far astray.

[-] wahming@monyet.cc 13 points 1 year ago
[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago

Doesn't matter her age when the comment says "Whatever she is just lock her up."

[-] EyIchFragDochNur@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Thank you. I feel like there's a lot of mouth foam around here in the comments

[-] subignition@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

What would you rather do? Fine them six years worth of prison fees plus lost wages? How proportionate a response is appropriate?

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

10 years is way below criminal maturity. At that age I'd very much rather have a close look at everyone who interviewed her. It's terribly easy to get kids to make false statements.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Well, we locked an innocent man up for 6 years for doing absolutely nothing wrong, so......

[-] EyIchFragDochNur@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Yea it wasn't the dumb child locking him up. It was the court/the legal system

this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
769 points (100.0% liked)

Facepalm

2781 readers
24 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS