11
submitted 11 months ago by morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de to c/yurop@lemm.ee
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

There was literally a European Council meeting in the mid-90s simply to thrash out the question of the name. Because there were other more imaginative proposals: florin, shilling, and of course ecu. But they went with euro, the lowest possible common denominator which offended nobody. I remember thinking what a terrible missed opportunity that was. I still think that.

[-] MudMan@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago

I appreciate the sheer gumption. They should have doubled down and just called it "money". Plural "moneys". How much is it? Seven moneys.

Actually, now that I think about it I know at least two countries that arguably already do that, so... you know what? Euro is dumber. Love it.

[-] Flag@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

But that, explicitly with 'money' is english cultural imperialism. Would never be accepted in france etc.

this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
11 points (100.0% liked)

YUROP

1264 readers
2 users here now

A laid back community for good news, pictures and general discussions among people living in Europe.

Other European communities

Other casual communities:

Language communities

Cities

Countries

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS