569
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

K Monica Kelly had to travel to Florida for an abortion after her fetus was diagnosed with trisomy 13 – now she’s part of a group suing her state

When K Monica Kelly saw that women in Texas had filed a lawsuit challenging the contours of their state’s abortion ban, she posted on Instagram to cheer them on.

“I shared how terrible I thought it was, that they weren’t able to get the proper healthcare they needed in their state,” Kelly said. “It never crossed my mind that that was actually going to happen to me soon.”

Kelly and her husband spent a year trying to have a second baby. So when they discovered in February 2023 that Kelly was pregnant, the couple was ecstatic. They taught their son, who was then two years old, to describe their family as: “Mama, dada, me, baby, all four!” After an ultrasound looked promising, and they drove more than 10 hours from their home in northern Tennessee to announce the news to their family in Florida.

Only days later, after they’d returned home, in late March, the pair drove back to Florida. This time, though, the drive was “surreal and devastating”, Kelly said. A series of catastrophic fetal diagnoses had led Kelly to decide to get an abortion – a procedure she could not legally get in Tennessee.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 19 points 9 months ago

This is like "is dating women gay?"

"Are oppressive laws passed by Republicans the Democrats fault?"

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

"Are oppressive laws passed by Republicans the Democrats fault?"

When they have the power to change it and don't?

Absolutely.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

When have the Democrats had a 2/3 majority necessary to bring a Constitutional Amendment to vote?

Because that's the only legal path to over riding the Supreme Court's ruling.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Under Obama, and no, that's not their only path.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago

...but they don't have the power to change it? Mainly because people keep voting for Republicans come rain or shine, vote for Democrats when the syzzergy of planets is correct and the tea leaves are vibing and they didn't see a green car on voting day, and vote for a 3rd party literally never even if it would kill them not to.

And I say this as someone who desperately wishes the 3rd party option was half as good as the UK's options.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

And I say this as someone who desperately wishes the 3rd party option was half as good as the UK's options.

You say this as someone who doesn't care about outcomes, because all you've seen for the last 40 years is gradual, but inevitable conservative outcomes, and you're going to pretend voting Democrat changes that anyway.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago

So what do you propose? Let the Republicans be in charge?

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Really, really listen to what you're saying.

I propose we all vote for a third party instead.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

I'm reading what you are saying. What you said is because Democrats have never the had power to make the changes you want, you will put Republicans in charge.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

No, because I'm not a partisan who votes Republican or Democrat.

For me, voting records matter. That's why I vote third party. You're the one voting for party no matter what they do.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Democrats never had the power to do what you wanted them to do. So you enable Republicans to do worse.

[-] badaboomxx@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Democrats had the power and chose not to wield it. They love the Jim Crow Filibuster too much.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

So you want the Republicans to be in charge.

If you want any viable third party, you need to be pushing for election reform at the state/local level. I'd prefer the Star system, but even ranked choice would be better than FPTP. The system was designed to be difficult to change at the federal level, but easy to change at the local level.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

So you want the Republicans to be in charge.

No. In fact, I've said otherwise several times in this thread.

Further, by voting for do-nothing Democrats, you're doing far more to help Republicans than I am.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

This is the voting map of the USA.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:2020_United_States_presidential_election_results_map_by_county.svg

Voting is by county at the local level and by state at the national. It doesn't matter that it isn't democratic. It is the law as it exists. THE POPULATION DOES NOT MATTER.

Claiming Democrats are do nothing is like blaming Blacks for being a minority.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I propose we all vote for a third party instead.

Uh huh...

Do you have any realistic suggestions?

this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
569 points (100.0% liked)

News

23387 readers
2615 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS