539
Anon is an Aussie (sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Hmm. Wasn't starlink supposed to propagate directly from satellite to satellite around the world? Or is that still not the case? The speed of light is only reached in vacuum (it's slower in fiberglass, like 66%) and afaik one of the selling points was that they could do high-frequency trading faster between the stock exchanges of london and new york. And the reason why they use low earth orbit. So I assumed this should significantly reduce ping.

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Fair criticisms!

I didn't closely follow Starlink-related news recently, but regardless, on such a high distance and such a low height I expect the very curvature of the Earth being a problem with direct transmission of signals from one satellite to the other. May be wrong again, though, didn't calculate.

Also fair on speed of light. However, even if we don't count travelling up, down, and extra equipment, and take 33% improvement at face value, this turns 80-150ms ping into 53-100ms, which is still clearly not good enough for competitive gaming.

[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah I haven't followed either why I'm curious if any of the claimed benefits materialized.

this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
539 points (100.0% liked)

Greentext

4472 readers
1878 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS