666
submitted 7 months ago by Jaysyn@kbin.social to c/politics@lemmy.world

Justin Mohn, a 32-year-old Pennsylvania man, is in police custody after allegedly murdering and decapitating his father, claiming the latter was a "federal employee" and a "traitor." Before his arrest, Mohn posted a 14-minute video to YouTube in which he displayed his father's severed head, proclaiming: "This is the head of Mike Mohn, a federal

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] stoly@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

It's a good thing that I was able to read articles that professional psychologists wrote on the subject. But go ahead, be angry.

[-] Neon@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Then how about

  1. You link them when asked about your sources (or actually just link them when making such a Statement)
  2. You don't present it as your own Opinion

And yes, I am angry. Angry about all these self-proclaimed Experts these days who think they know everything and know more than Experts who studied this Subject for years.

All those People who are Climatechange Experts but couldn't even really tell you, what the Ozone-Layer exactly is.

Or all those People who proclaim a Genocide in Gaza, but couldn't even tell you where or how a Genocide is defined.

If you're not qualified, you're allowed to just not say anything and not spew disinformation.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This is common knowledge. Your ignorance is not my responsibility. You could easily have looked it up yourself but decided to project your ignorance on us instead.

Your anger is yours, it has nothing to do with reality. It is something you should deal with through therapy, not by going on tirades against random people on Lemmy simply because you don't have the experience and education to understand the things that they are talking about. We do not deserve to suffer your insecurity.

Every single example you gave has a great deal of evidence behind it. You do not like that, and this causes you pain. This is all about you.

Also references to Mao are probably not going to help you here.

[-] Neon@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I don't even know where to start

You made an imaginary picture of me based off of two comments. Then you used that nonexistent, imaginary version of me to make up your opinon and write this Comment in which you call me "ignorant", "insecure", "inexperienced", "uneducated", and just all-round talk me down.

So do you now understand why i didn't believe you?

Your Comment here is nothing more that baseless Slander and i have no Reason to assume you did any more "Research" for your previous Comment than you did for this one.

As such i do not see the Point in continuing this Conversation with you and will stop here.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

This is so tedious that I am going to go ahead and block you. Take your fake outrage and go somewhere else.

this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
666 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18904 readers
2809 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS