621
New gender gap (lemmy.ml)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 74 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Here in South Korea - Both the liberal and conservative party are very conservative. It wasn't until 10-15 years ago that women could even be the "leader" of the house. So the delta in conservative/liberal is more likely to do with economic/war policies with the North than much else (since men get conscripted, and North policies is one of the key differentiators between the 2 parties)

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

South Korea also has one of the biggest anti-feminism movements in the world. They just eliminated the gender ministry and rolled back protections for women. Not coincidentally, South Korea is Jordan Peterson’s biggest audience outside the US.

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

The translation of "gender ministry" is completely misleading, I don't know why they made it that in English because that's not what it is. In Korean it's "여성가족부" which means "Woman's family department"

[-] Dasnap@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wouldn't it be men making the decision on conscription policies though? A more liberal / less sexist government would be more likely to bin that.

The key difference I tend to see between men and women's issues is that men's issues are often caused by other men in power. Feminism, ironically enough, can also help with a lot of problems disenfranchised men have.

Sorry I'm rambling a bit.

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sooooo yes, everything you said is correct, but there's a missing piece of context: binning the military would mean binning South Korea as we know it, so nobody (liberal or conservative) is in favor of binning it. The lines are much more murky.

[-] Hawke@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Binning a sexist conscription system is not anything close to “binning the military”

[-] people_are_cute@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

It very literally is, in South Korea's case.

[-] Hawke@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

How so?

Beginning to conscript women as well as men does not equate to abolishing the military, or am I missing something?

[-] Exosus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

What? Do you want half the army shopping for new shoes to wear in the trenches while the other half has to wait for them at the shopping mall fountain?

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Were you trying to be funny, or is that your genuine understanding of women in the millitary?

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

They could conscript women, but you can imagine how hard it would be for that legislation to pass.

[-] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 2 points 1 year ago

Men are not a monolith.

[-] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

right. Korean politics seem to come down to "aid vs embargo". moon jae in was on the aid side, right? I haven't followed the current prez, what's their deal?

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

President Yoon is a fascist that got into power by targeting women and disabled people.

this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
621 points (100.0% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

7107 readers
1 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS