241
submitted 9 months ago by zephyreks@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

That would be doctrinal breaktrough

No it wouldn't. This is a standard way of talking about marriage in oppressive religions, including Catholicism

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

So by "relationships" he just meant "marriage" as church always did? It's clear from the context he is not, since lower there is mentions of "same-sex relationships", not to mention even the word itself suggest any something wider.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

I think he's intentionally vague when using the word relationships. The word does not explicitly mean any one thing. But yeah sex within marriage has always been praised in Christianity. It's been a big selling point of marriage in general. I don't see anything in the article to suggest he's explicitly blessed homosexual sex or truly changed any doctrine.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago

Yeah, if that was taken on a face value then the acceptance of all kinds of extramarital relationships would be a big doctrinal change, but nothing is happening, as i noted in my first post.

this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
241 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32297 readers
645 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS