96
Sweden's call for population to prepare for war sparks panic and criticism
(www.france24.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
96 points (100.0% liked)
Europe
8332 readers
1 users here now
News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures
Rules
(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)
- Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
- No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
- No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.
Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
You should actually always be prepared for things like that. My government says people should keep enough things for two weeks, just in case. It's good advice. You never know when some manic dictator launches a multi-front blitzkrieg he can't win, but will devastate the whole region
The two weeks preparedness have been around for a long time in Sweden. It is far from what this issue is about. One of the issues was the goverment's focus on that you should be prepared to die in war. Sure, it is true that you as a Swedish citizen may have to put you life on the line in case of war. But them focusing on that you should be prepared to die just framed it as if war is coming definetly and soon. The second issue is that the current government is obsessed with fearmongering about immigrants. One of the big points they made was that people who have immigrated and earned their citizenship will not be as willing to protect the country in case of war. I read a title of an article today that said experts have critiqued this statement and said it may actually be the other way around.
Makes sense, they're the ones who had to work for it.
What's the logic in two weeks of provisions? Day 15 sounds like it would be just as much of a shit show as days 1-14.
Just holding out until more organised help can arrive or your government takes over. This is also in general good advice in case of say natural disasters. Roads may be flooded, areas covered in snow or electricity is out for a few days. Having enough canned food, water, maybe some firewood or alternative means of cooking will come in useful in these circumstances.
so you don't starve while acquiring more or evacuating.
Two weeks is a suggestion, you can do more if you like. There's no hard limit.
Well, technically there is a hard upper limit at the point where the first necessary nutrient isn't available in the form of some food (or pill,...) that lasts that long I suppose.
I'd call that more if a soft limit as I doubt its definable that far in the future.
Well, it's because there can always be a power outtage or they have to shutdown the water mains or in my country more likely a flood. All of those are agazillion times more likely than a war, but still reason enough to at least have some supplies.