56
submitted 10 months ago by Pete90@feddit.de to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

Network design. I started my homelab / selfhost journey about a year ago. Network design was the topic that scared me most. To challenge myself, and to learn about it, I bought myself a decent firewall box with 4 x 2.5G NICs. I installed OPNsense on it, following various guides. I setup my 3 LAN ports as a network bridge to connect my PC, NAS and server. I set the filtering to be applied between these different NICs, as to learn more about the behavior of the different services. If I want to access anything on my server from my PC, there needs to be a rule allowing it. All other trafic is blocked. This setup works great so far an I'm really happy with it.

Here is where I ran into problems. I installed Proxmox on my server and am in the process of migrating all my services from my NAS over there. I thought that all trafic from a VM in Proxmox would go this route: first VM --> OPNsense --> other VM. Then, I could apply the appropriate firewall rules. This however, doesnt seem to be the case. From what I've learned, VMs in Proxmox can communicate freely with each other by default. I don't want this.

From my research, I found different ideas and opposing solutions. This is where I could use some guidance.

  1. Use VLANs to segregate the VMs from each other. Each VLAN gets a different subnet.
  2. Use the Proxmox firewall to prevent communication between VMs. I'd rather avoid this, so I don't have to apply firewall rules twice. I could also install another OPNsense VM and use that, but same thing.
  3. Give up on filtering traffic between my PC, NAS and server. I trust all those devices, so it wouldn't be the end of the world. I just wanted the most secure setup I could do with my current knowledge.

Is there any way to just force the VM traffic through my OPNsense firewall? I thought this would be easy, but couldn't find anything or just very confusing ideas.

I also have a second question. I followed TechnoTim to setup Treafik and use my local DNS and wildcard certificates. Now, I can reach my services using service.local.example.com, which I think is neat. However, in order to do this, it was suggested to use one docker network called proxy. Each service would be assigned this network and Traefik uses lables to setup the routes. ' Would't this allow all those services to communciate freely? Normally, each container has it's own network and docker uses iptables to isolate them from each other. Is this still the way to go? I'm a bit overwhelmed by all those options.

Is my setup overkill? I'd love to hear what you guys think! Thank you so much!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It sounds like what you're looking to achieve is what's known as zero trust architecture (ZTA). The primary concept is that you never implicitly trust a particular piece of traffic, and always verify it instead.

The most common way I've seen this achieved is exactly what you're talking about - more micro-segmentation of your network.

The design principles are usually centred around what the crown jewels are in your network. For most companies applying ZTA, that's usually their data, especially customer data.

Ideally you create a segment that holds that data, but no processing/compute/applications. You can also create additional segments for more specific use cases if you like, but I've rarely seen this get beyond three primary segments: server; database; data storage (file servers, etc).

In your case, you can either create three separate VLANs on your Proxmox cluster, with your your OPNsense firewall having an interface defined in each, or use the Proxmox firewall. I'd go the former - OPNsense is a lot more capable than the Proxmox firewall, especially if you turn on intrusion detection.

I'm not using any further segmentation beyond my VMs sitting in their own VLAN from my physical, but here's a screenshot of my networking setup on Proxmox. I wrote this reply to another post here on Selfhosted, talking about how my interfaces are setup. In my case, I have OPNsense running as a VM on the same Proxmox cluster. As I said in there, it's a bit of a headfuck getting it done, but very easy to manage once setup.

BTW, ZTA isn't overkill if it's what YOU want to do.

You're teaching yourself some very valuable skills and, and you clearly have a natural talent for thinking both vertically and horizontally about your security. This shit is gold when I interview young techs. One of my favourite interview moments is when I ask about their home setups, and then get to see their passion ignite when they talk about it.

[-] filister@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I want to do exactly that on my fw router. I have installed two identical SSDs and the plan is to install Proxmox and run Opnsense on top of it. I also want to segment my WLAN and allocate the 5GHz to phones and laptops and tablets. 2.4GHz to IoT devices and the Guest WLAN for occasional guests. Each one of them should be in a separate VLAN.

My ISP router would have the WLAN disabled and I will run it through a Netgear RX7800 running OpenWRT. The idea is to run Opnsense with intrusion detection and serve as the primary gateway for every device in my network.

Any guide or hint how I can achieve that would be highly appreciated.

[-] DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

VLANs are absolutely the key here. I run 4 SSIDs, each with its own VLAN. You haven't mentioned what switch hardware you're using, but I'm assuming it's VLAN-capable.

The (high-level) way I'd approach this would be to first assign a VLAN for each purpose. In your case, sounds like three VLANs for the different WLAN classes (people; IoT; guest) and at least another for infrastructure (maybe two - I have my Proxmox VMs in their own VLAN, separate to physical infra).


VLANS

Sounds like 5 VLANs. For the purposes of this, I'll assign them thusly:

  1. vlan10: people, 192.168.10.0/24
  2. vlan20: physical infrastructure, 192.168.20.0/24
  3. vlan30: Proxmox/virtual infra, 192.168.30.0/24
  4. vlan40: IoT, 192.168.40.0/24
  5. vlan50: guest, 192.168.50.0/24

That'll give you 254 usable IP addresses in each VLAN. I'm assuming that'll be enough. ;)


SWITCH

On your switch, define a couple of trunk ports tagging appropriate VLANs for their purpose:

  1. One for your Nighthawk, tagging VLANs 10, 20, 40 and 50 (don't need 30 - Proxmox/VMs don't use wireless)
  2. One for your Proxmox LAN interface, tagging all VLANs (you ultimately want to route all traffic through OPNsense)

If you had additional wired access points for your wireless network, you'd create additional trunk ports for those per item 1. If you have additional Proxmox servers in your cluster, ditto for item 2 above.


WIRELESS

I'm not that familiar with OpenWRT, but I assume you can create some sort of rules that lands clients into VLANs of your choice, and tags the traffic that way. That how it is on my Aruba APs.

For example, anything connecting to the IoT SSID would be tagged with vlan40. Guest with vlan50, and so on.


PROXMOX

  1. Create a Linux Bridge interface for the LAN interface, bridging the physical interface connected to SWITCH item 2, above
  2. Create Linux VLAN interfaces on the bridge interface, for each VLAN (per my screenshot example)

You haven't mentioned internet/WAN but, if you're going to use OPNsense as your primary firewall/router in/out of your home network, you'd also create a Linux Bridge interface to the physical interface connecting your internet


OPNSENSE

This is the headfuck stage (at least, it was for me at first). Simply put, you need to attach the Proxmox interfaces to your OPNsense VM, and create VLAN interfaces inside OPNsense, for each VLAN.

I'm not going to attempt to explain it in reduced, comment form - no way I could do it justice. This guide helped me immensely in getting mine working.


If you have any issues after attempting this, just sing out mate, and I'll try and help out. Only ask is that we try and deal with it in comment form here where practical, for when Googlers in the future land here in the Fediverse.

[-] filister@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Thanks a lot for the detailed reply, and the time you took to answer an Internet stranger. Much appreciated.

[-] Pete90@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago

Thank you so much for your kind words, very encouraging. I like to do some research along my tinkering, and I like to challenge myself. I don't even work in the field, but I find it fascinating.

The ZTA is/was basically what I was aiming for. With all those replies, I'm not so sure if it is really needed. I have a NAS with my private files, a nextcloud with the same. The only really critical thing will be my Vaultwarden instance, to which I want to migrate from my current KeePass setup. And this got me thinking, on how to secure things properly.

I mostly found it easy to learn things when it comes to networking, if I disable all trafic and then watch the OPNsense logs. Oh, my PC uses this and this port to print on this interface. Cool, I'll add that. My server needs access to the SMB port on my NAS, added. I followed this logic through, which in total got me around 25-30 firewall rules making heavy use of aliases and a handfull of floating rules.

My goal is to have the control for my networking on my OPNsense box. There, I can easily log in, watch the live log and figure out, what to allow and what not. And it's damn satisfying to see things being blocked. No more unknown probes on my nextcloud instance (or much reduced).

The question I still haven't answered to my satisfaction is, if I build a strict ZTA or fall back to a more relaxed approach like you outlined with your VMs. You seem knowledgable. What would you do, for a basic homelab setup (Nextcloud, Jellyfin, Vaultwarden and such)?

[-] DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com 1 points 10 months ago

What would you do, for a basic homelab setup (Nextcloud, Jellyfin, Vaultwarden and such)?

I guess my first question is are you intending to open up any of these to be externally available? Once you understand the surface area of a potential attack, you can be a lot more specific about how you protect yourself.

I have just about everything blocked off for external access, and use an always-on Wireguard VPN to access them when I'm not home. That makes my surface area a lot smaller, and easier to protect.

[-] Pete90@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago

Only Nextcloud if externally available so far, maybe I'll add Vaultwarden in the future.

I would like to use a VPN, but my family is not tech literate enough for this to work reliably.

I want to protect these public facing services by using an isolated Traefik instance in conjunction with Cloudflare and Crowdsec.

[-] DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com 2 points 10 months ago

Right, then you'll probably want to do something similar to what I'm planning next, which is creating a small "DMZ" VLAN, for the public facing things, and being very specific about the ACLs in/out, default deny anything else.

The few things I allow public access to are via Nginx Proxy Manager, using Authelia for SSO/2FA where applicable. I'm intending to move that container into a dedicated VLAN that only allows port 443 in from anywhere (including other VLANs), and only allows specific IP/port combinations out for the services it proxies.

I don't even intend to allow SSH in/out for that container. I can console in from the Proxmox management console if required.

[-] Pete90@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago

Sounds like I'll do just that, thanks. Should I move all public facing services to that DMZ or is it enough to just isolate Traefik?

[-] DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com 1 points 10 months ago

Just the stuff that's being accessed directly, so if anything's only going to be accessed via your Traefik server from outside, leave them where they are. That way, any compromise of your Traefik server doesn't let them move laterally within the same VLAN (your DMZ) to the real host.

[-] Pete90@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago

I see, thanks for clearing that up.

this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
56 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

40113 readers
831 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS