1745
Basic Constitutional Law
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
1745 points (100.0% liked)
Political Memes
5424 readers
1499 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
If it comes down to that, I think Beast would be a no brainer.
The literal no brain would be JAKE PAUL YEAh he can punch people, but yeah.
Is there an ihadastroke community for lemmy?
I'm sorry but I can't tell what you are trying to say.
Okay, let me diagram the sentence for you.
The
-- would (verb modifier)
be (verb)
JAKE PAUL (noun, subject)
then, as a run-on sentence, and exclamation
Since you don't seem to understand American English as commonly spoken, I'll try to explain. If you've had a stroke recently, I understand.
"The literal no brain" means "the action that would be done by someone who has no brains", as in, very unintelligent or not thinking.
"would be"
"JAKE PAUL YEAh" : to cheer for Jake Paul.
"he can punch people" : in context, someone with no brains would cheer for Jake Paul due to his physical fighting prowess.
Hope that helps.
That does not help
Funny way to explain all that though so I must approve of the effort