70
[Discussion] Pre-emptive Threads defederation (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by ruplicant@sh.itjust.works to c/agora@sh.itjust.works
97 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Should sh.itjust.works preemptively defederate from Threads?

Threads is the not-so-new ~~reddit-like~~ twitter-like public forum platform by Meta, the same commercial company behind internet behemoths like Facebook, Instagram and Whatsapp. They're working on ActivityPub integration so that they can bridge (federate?) with the fediverse. As far as I know, the focus is on Mastodon instances, but in the future that could include Lemmy instances too.

Some have raised the question, worried about the future of the fediverse or even claiming that it goes against its definition.

What do you think should be done?

EDIT: correction

EDIT.2: The Vote is on! Go make your voice heard. You have until Friday the 29th.

Fediverse instances' status on federation with Threads

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

spam fake votes

Why not? They already manipulate their feed on Facebook, why not do it on Threads as well? Yeah, they probably wouldn't do it at launch, but they'll probably work it in later.

That's not really what I'm worried about though, I'm more worried about my content being used to manipulate other users. I still don't want to see ads though.

sponsored posts via certain accounts

They'll probably just pay regular users to shill stuff. So ads won't be "buy X," but instead "X is great, I use it every day!"

I doubt they'd make something easily blockable like a unique account type visible to lemmy. Why would they? That would reduce their reach.

all of this is what ifs

Sure, but it's not like there isn't a ton of evidence to be skeptical. Meta makes almost all of its money through advertising. So they're going to make advertising a major part of any product they make. That's what they do, and calling that a "what if" is silly.

The real question is not if, but how much it'll impact lemmy. I don't see any reason to think they won't try to monetize lemmy users, so why give them the benefit of the doubt?

this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
70 points (100.0% liked)

The Agora

1599 readers
1 users here now

In the spirit of the Ancient Greek Agora, we invite you to join our vibrant community - a contemporary meeting place for the exchange of ideas, inspired by the practices of old. Just as the Agora served as the heart of public life in Ancient Athens, our platform is designed to be the epicenter of meaningful discussion and thought-provoking dialogue.

Here, you are encouraged to speak your mind, share your insights, and engage in stimulating discussions. This is your opportunity to shape and influence our collective journey, just like the free citizens of Athens who gathered at the Agora to make significant decisions that impacted their society.

You're not alone in your quest for knowledge and understanding. In this community, you'll find support from like-minded individuals who, like you, are eager to explore new perspectives, challenge their preconceptions, and grow intellectually.

Remember, every voice matters and your contribution can make a difference. We believe that through open dialogue, mutual respect, and a shared commitment to discovery, we can foster a community that embodies the democratic spirit of the Agora in our modern world.

Community guidelines
New posts should begin with one of the following:

Only moderators may create a [Vote] post.

Voting History & Results

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
TheDude@sh.itjust.works
imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
Seraph089@sh.itjust.works
Difficult_Bit_1339@sh.itjust.works